Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-04-2013, 07:35 PM
tilbrook@rbe.ne's Avatar
tilbrook@rbe.ne (Justin Tilbrook)
JHT

tilbrook@rbe.ne is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Penwortham
Posts: 3,039
NGC 4945, 5.46 hours.

Hi,

This year my plan is to shift into longer exposures, to squeeze a little more detail out.
Although 5.46 hours is not long compared to some, it's certainly enough to see a difference.
The main thing I see is a halo developing around NGC 4945.

Equipment.

8" Newtonian astrograph f/4. on Heq pro 5 mount. Orion mini guider.

Unmodded canon 1100D, baader coma corrector, cooler box.

41 x 8 minute subs, darks and flat frames applied.

Median stack in DSS, processed in PS7.

Cheers,

Justin.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc4945C copyF.jpg)
221.0 KB111 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2013, 07:51 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Never ceases to amaze me what you get from a DSLR, Justin-lovely image
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2013, 08:04 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,692
Nice result Justin, I like the composition. Is it a little out of focus or was that the seeing? (I know how F'ing annoying poor seeing can be )..ok had another look, seems the star diffraction spikes suggest the focus was ok..? Is it the noise reduction method you used perhaps?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2013, 08:21 PM
tilbrook@rbe.ne's Avatar
tilbrook@rbe.ne (Justin Tilbrook)
JHT

tilbrook@rbe.ne is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Penwortham
Posts: 3,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larryp View Post
Never ceases to amaze me what you get from a DSLR, Justin-lovely image
Thanks Laurie!

Still love the 1100D.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Nice result Justin, I like the composition. Is it a little out of focus or was that the seeing? (I know how F'ing annoying poor seeing can be )..ok had another look, seems the star diffraction spikes suggest the focus was ok..? Is it the noise reduction method you used perhaps?

Mike
Thanks Mike!

A little of each I think.
Certainly the seeing was not perfect, lot's of farmers burning off.
Definitely some processing problems, very different to short exposures to process.
think it will take a while to get on top of this.

Think I over cooked it the image, with too much noise reduction.

Cheers,

Justin.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2013, 09:58 PM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,459
Really liking the composition and what you have done with the processing. Right move to go for more data. Get lots of integration time. Just makes processing that much easier and yup, the fine detail arrives

Noice
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2013, 11:09 PM
tilbrook@rbe.ne's Avatar
tilbrook@rbe.ne (Justin Tilbrook)
JHT

tilbrook@rbe.ne is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Penwortham
Posts: 3,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT View Post
Really liking the composition and what you have done with the processing. Right move to go for more data. Get lots of integration time. Just makes processing that much easier and yup, the fine detail arrives

Noice
Thanks David!

Cheers,

Justin.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement