Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-05-2006, 06:57 PM
shaneaust's Avatar
shaneaust (Mick)
Registered User

shaneaust is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vic, Australia
Posts: 146
Collimation problem

I've attached a drawing of what I see in my scope (10" reflector/dob) when I look thru my home-made collimation tool, a 35mm film canister.

The reflection of the "centreing" mark on my primary is a bit off-centre. My question is: what needs to be adjusted - the secondary mirror's placement in its holder, the arms of the spider on the secondary, or the primary mirror?

I've looked at a number of collimation-related sites but havent yet found the answer to this one!

Help?
Attached Files
File Type: doc Collimation.doc (23.5 KB, 47 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-05-2006, 07:24 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
That is not really enough to show what is going on. The position of the spider and secondary need not be centred (and won't be for a properly collimated 10" dob because of 2ndary offset).

Assuming your secondary is good enough, what you need to do is place something highly reflective on the back of the film canister and then illuminate it so that you can see its reflection through the the hole in the film canister in the focuser. Then adjust the primary tilt until reflection of the back of the film canister is centred on the centre spot of the primary.

PS. I've attached a more browser-friendly version of Shane's drawing.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (shane-drawing.png)
8.3 KB26 views
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-05-2006, 08:27 PM
shaneaust's Avatar
shaneaust (Mick)
Registered User

shaneaust is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vic, Australia
Posts: 146
When you say "place something highly reflective on the back of the film canister" are you actually saying somethng around the "inside" back of the canister, surrounding the hole?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-05-2006, 09:07 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Yep thats what he means, or should mean
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-05-2006, 09:23 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Yes, the side facing the secondary mirror.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2006, 04:59 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
assuming that the offset dot would be similar to say the crosshair on a cheshire i'd say the secondary needs to come dow the tube a bit.... or am i totally off base?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement