Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-03-2013, 11:09 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Mosaic of Markarian's Chain

Im attempting a large mosaic in Virgo to see how many galaxies that I can actually render in this region.
So far I have 5 panels of 4x5 min of Lum data with 5"apo and QSI583wsg. Hoping for a far larger set when the clouds go away but its been easier with SG Pro and the Great Atlas of The Sky to plan each shot.
Comments welcome
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Untitled-2_filtered-inverted_filtered-reduced.jpg)
193.6 KB92 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-03-2013, 11:25 PM
DavidTrap's Avatar
DavidTrap (David)
Really just a beginner

DavidTrap is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,045
You're going to have to give lessons on mosaics Allan!

DT
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-03-2013, 11:29 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
You've nailed the focus - those stars are pinpoint. Looking forward to the finished image.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-03-2013, 11:37 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
I got sidetracked tonight as its so clear for the first time in ages.
Ive always wanted to image NGC2442 (the meathook galaxy that Peter Marples pointed out to me) and Im using SG Pro to gather the data while I sit inside wtching TV. The autofocus routines are rally giving me sharp stars as the temperature falls and Im doing 30 minute subs here in the warm glow of BrisVegas with the 10" GSO RC. Im having a ball ATM and will get some colour tomorrow night on 2442.
Thanks for the comments Peter and David, very much appreciated. There are so many many small galaxies in the original which tend to get lost with the JPEG reduction but Im enjoying the mosaic. Cant wait until SG Pro makes this a totally automatic process.
Regards, Allan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-03-2013, 11:55 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Very well put together Allan. Focus looks spot on.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-03-2013, 12:14 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Looking forward to this mosaic, Allan!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-03-2013, 07:25 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Great project. Looks good already.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-03-2013, 04:04 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidU View Post
Very well put together Allan. Focus looks spot on.
Thanks Dave, I have a long way to go with this and its just a start.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Looking forward to this mosaic, Allan!
Me too!
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Great project. Looks good already.
Thanks Marc. Cant wait til SG Pro makes the mosaicing an automatic process which should be comming soon. The autofocus and sequence routines make this an easier approach that normal but I couldnt even attempt it if it wrent for the plate solving which is essential. It puts me to a few pixels of where I should be.
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-03-2013, 07:50 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Great project Allan, I imagine the smaller galaxies would be easier to pick out in the non negative version and at full res? Negative representations are good to show faint extensions and nebulosity/dust but not so good at showcasing tiny galaxies, if the negative is too white they are too hard to see or if you ramp up the contrast they start to look like black stars.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-03-2013, 08:42 PM
ozstronomer's Avatar
ozstronomer (Geoff)
Registered User

ozstronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 965
Allan, you are on a roll with these mosaics, looks great so far.

Looking forward to seeing the full image.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-03-2013, 10:09 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Great project Allan, I imagine the smaller galaxies would be easier to pick out in the non negative version and at full res? Negative representations are good to show faint extensions and nebulosity/dust but not so good at showcasing tiny galaxies, if the negative is too white they are too hard to see or if you ramp up the contrast they start to look like black stars.

Mike
Mike
You are right as small galaxies are easier to see but I just liked the inverted image and went with that. I'm going to plan exactly where to go as its tempting to lose your resolve and start imaging all the goodies in Virgo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozstronomer View Post
Allan, you are on a roll with these mosaics, looks great so far.

Looking forward to seeing the full image.
Thanks for the comment Geoff, much appreciated and I'm also looking forward to the end but I think it may take a few seasons on and off. I need Bert's camera and scope in all reality.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-03-2013, 12:03 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Sounds like you've really got the technology working for your Allan. I've never really been happy with my automated mosaic'ing performance, so following your adventure with interest.

Its hard to beat a well performed mosaic for sheer scope and image tightness. Also a great way to increase your % of grey hair sometimes too though!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16-03-2013, 01:40 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Sounds like you've really got the technology working for your Allan. I've never really been happy with my automated mosaic'ing performance, so following your adventure with interest.

Its hard to beat a well performed mosaic for sheer scope and image tightness. Also a great way to increase your % of grey hair sometimes too though!
Im using Sequence Generator Pro for the mosaics and the center here and autofocus routines make mosaicing very easy. That said they are actually implementing an automatic routine where by you define the object, give the no of frames to do and it will automatically start doing it, checking with plate solving that each frame gives the right overlap etc. Will be happening in a few more weeks iI suspect. SG Pro now handles it all including multiple tagets, autofocus, sequence of images and a whole lot more. Just so simple.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16-03-2013, 08:39 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Looks good Allan.

Good luck..great project.


Ross.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement