Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-05-2006, 09:23 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Anyone Tried A Firewire Camera??

Hi all,
having used a ToUcam for quite a while now, I am wondering about trying a Firewire camera. I know of a few others who have overseas, but wondered if anyone within this group has, and if so, what their experiences, good and bad, have been.
I really need a "Seeing Adjustment Device" first, but in the interim maybe this new tack will help.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-05-2006, 09:47 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Paul Haese in SA bought one recently. By the time you get the camera (a mono one), filters, auto/manual filter wheel, you're looking at at least $2k-$3k.

So not cheap. But the results definitely seem worth it.

Increased sensitivity, higher frame rate, no compression.

All good things. It will most likely be my next imaging purchase (yes, even before an EQ6!), but at that cost, it's some time away.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-05-2006, 10:23 AM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
What do you guys think about using MiniDV cameras? You can get the video straight to you computer via Firewire on these.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-05-2006, 11:52 AM
joe_smith's Avatar
joe_smith
Registered User

joe_smith is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ingleburn
Posts: 481
Pauls work can be found here http://southcelestialpole.org/scpBB/viewforum.php?f=4

But as iceman said it exspenive setup, but you get the very good results with it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-05-2006, 01:12 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Thanks Mike, I have actually spoken to him about it, and his results certainly speak for themselves. I just wondered if anyone else had taken the plunge as well.
Like you, it could be a while away given the cost(s). Plus if Paul's results are anything to go by, it wasn't an instant transformation, rather a whole new learning curve. He certainly is on top of it now though.
More study needed.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-05-2006, 01:10 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
I'm wondering what the colour cameras are like as opposed to the mono like Pauls....?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-05-2006, 01:27 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Easier to use, but less resolution, and no ability to manually focus each colour channel, or manually change the capture parameters (gain etc) for each colour channel.

It's certainly a next step up, and cheaper because you won't need colour filters, filter wheels etc, but if you're going to spend that sort of money, I reckon it's worth going the extra yards and going mono/RGB.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement