#1  
Old 25-11-2011, 03:10 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Review of 6303 cameras

I am interested in reviews of any camera using a 6303 chip.

I am interested in this chip and there are several cameras available with this one.

How good is this chip for astrophotography? Or is it more suited to narrowband than LRGB as its QE curve seems to peak at the Ha area
(around 65%) which is unusual but is a bit low for greens and blues (around 40-50%). The QE curve appears a bit peaky compared to other chips but it is also higher QE than most.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-11-2011, 05:17 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
I don't own one Greg, but one thing that has always put me off is that it is NABG. The sensor was at one stage made with ABG but apparently not any more. Mind you with the well depth that is present in the sensor you could well get away with 15 minute subs before blooming becomes a problem.

Steve Crouch owns one of these, so he might chime in and let you know what the sensor is like.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-11-2011, 05:21 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
NABG is an issue but I think it is manageable. NABG sensors in general are more sensitive than ABG sensors due to the pathways needed for the antiblooming takes out some of the sensor area.

Not a sensor that would be good for the Pleiades or Horsehead widefield.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-11-2011, 05:27 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
True.

The beauty of this sensor though is that it is near perfect for mosaic work. Well at least that is what I have read. I did at one time contemplate getting one rather than the STL11K. In the end I wanted real estate more.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-11-2011, 06:56 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
I had not heard that before. Its very even - is that the idea for perfect for mosaics?

Its an interesting issue sensitivity versus real estate. Certainly a larger FOV is the popular choice but it would depend on the type of image you want to produce.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-11-2011, 07:41 PM
Doomsayer
Registered User

Doomsayer is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 222
6303

Hi Greg. I own an STL6303 with a class 1 chip. Blooming can be a challenge if there is a bright field star for LRGB but it is usually manageable. Goes great on deep galaxies and narrowband of course. The 6303 chip benefits from deep cooling - I try to run my STL at minus 20 or -25C - see Richard Crisp's tests on cooling. So the STX 6303 is a well priced option given its deeper cooling than the STL and the current discounts on offer. I was keen on a Proline or Microline 6303 but these are comparatively expensive, but based on my own experience of FLI performance with my Proline it would be well worth it. Neil Fleming uses an STL6303 very successfully with an FSQ on deep narrowband. There are plenty of shots with fast ASA newtonians and 6303 chips around too.

The other chip to consider is the 16801 -possibly ideal if your telescope has the covering ability- the 16801 is the NABG version of the 16803 - higher QE than the 6303 and the 16803 - not sure about well depth. However, a much more expensive option than the 6303 or the 16803.

guy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-11-2011, 08:17 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Thanks for that Guy.

16801 is very expensive, a Proline with that is around $20K. You are nearly at those 96%QE back thinned E2V sensors at that price.

STX, Microline, Proline are similarly priced. STX main advantage is self guiding. It seems electronics and cooling are similar with STX as well.
Provision for a 2nd guider if using a guide scope is an edge for STX.

I haven't heard anything about the artificial star STX guiding yet.
Perhaps that never eventuated.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-11-2011, 08:27 PM
cventer's Avatar
cventer
Registered User

cventer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 957
Greg, The differential guiding with artificial star was demonstrated at the recent AIC conf in usa same time sbig announced the STF-8300. They say they have it working now. They give some detail about it in the video floating from Mike Barber
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-11-2011, 08:36 PM
Doomsayer
Registered User

Doomsayer is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 222
STX, Microline, Proline are similarly priced. STX main advantage is self guiding. It seems electronics and cooling are similar with STX as well.
Provision for a 2nd guider if using a guide scope is an edge for STX.


The STX6303 class2 is being advertised for US7995. The FLI 6303s have gone down in price since the last time I looked - interesting..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-11-2011, 09:19 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by cventer View Post
Greg, The differential guiding with artificial star was demonstrated at the recent AIC conf in usa same time sbig announced the STF-8300. They say they have it working now. They give some detail about it in the video floating from Mike Barber
Thanks Chris.

Snake Valley cancelled due to weather?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsayer View Post
STX, Microline, Proline are similarly priced. STX main advantage is self guiding. It seems electronics and cooling are similar with STX as well.
Provision for a 2nd guider if using a guide scope is an edge for STX.


The STX6303 class2 is being advertised for US7995. The FLI 6303s have gone down in price since the last time I looked - interesting..
Yeah now you mention it. They used to be US$8000 + as I recall.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25-11-2011, 10:22 PM
cventer's Avatar
cventer
Registered User

cventer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 957
Cancelled no. but forecast is way too dodgy for me to bother packing up all my stuff tonight. Will re avaluate tomorrow night.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement