Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-02-2006, 12:17 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
My new Hutech 350d

Hi all
It finally arrived this morning. I went for the clear filter option, like Houghys 300D.
The In camera noise reduction works well, a 5 minute test shot at ISO 1600 with lens cap on, noise reduction off showd many times more noise then a 10 minute shot with the noise reduction on. Only downside is doubling of exposure times.
Heres the first astro images I took with it tonight between gaps in the cloud.
Note, they are all single images , none are stacked multiple images. Just played with them a bit in photoshop and used noiseware on them, thats all
Thanks to Houghy for lending me his new Baader IR/UV cut filter too.
Scott
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (165seciso800 uhcs filter_filteredsmall.jpg)
53.8 KB73 views
Click for full-size image (264seciso400ircut filter_filteredsmall.jpg)
43.0 KB62 views
Click for full-size image (193seciso1600bsmall.jpg)
76.7 KB69 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-02-2006, 01:14 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Stunning images Scott. Really great stuff for such short exposure. Very smooth, so little noise, really great.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-02-2006, 03:31 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,643
Excellent results Scott.
Well done.
They're amazing cameras.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-02-2006, 05:51 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Very red! Very nice!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-02-2006, 07:17 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
SCott has engaged the hyperdrive now
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-02-2006, 07:18 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Thanks all.
Theres a fair bit of noise with the N/R off on ISO 1600 shots, but the in camera n/r is a Godsend for getting rid of most of it. Ironically with my 300D, Photoshop CS somehow gets rid of a fair bit of the noise (but not the amp glow) automatically when I open raw images with it, but CS2 does not, nor does it with the 350D, and sadly Adobe decided not to support the 350D with CS. So despite the xtra time I will always shoot deep sky with the in camera n/r on.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-02-2006, 07:26 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
I should mention the the first shot is a 165 sec shot @ ISO 800, the middle image is without the UHCS filter, and is a 265 sec shot @ ISO 400, the last shot is a 193 sec shot @ ISO 1600
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-02-2006, 08:40 AM
Robby's Avatar
Robby
Registered User

Robby is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,079
Nice Scott... Now you can give Houghy his camera back....
What's this about engaging your Hyperdrive Houghy... One could definately read that the wrong way
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-02-2006, 10:32 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116

now if I can only get a nice cloudless night.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-02-2006, 10:59 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Scott, was the IRUV filter used on all shots?

Robby, I have had my camera back, complete with dribble marks from Scott for nearly a week, but it has been cloudy and terrible conditions. I haven't got the hyperdrive, read the post carefully Rob!.

Yes it shows the red, but wow, look at the details!!!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-02-2006, 12:37 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
wowie!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-02-2006, 03:02 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
very cool shots
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-02-2006, 03:08 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Thier all really nice Scott..well done mate and enjoy your new camera.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 18-02-2006, 09:19 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Thanks
The UV/IR filter was used on the 2 and 3rd shots
Scott
PS sorry about the drool marks Houghy
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 18-02-2006, 09:29 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Strangely enough I prefer the one on the left
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 18-02-2006, 09:58 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33
Thanks
The UV/IR filter was used on the 2 and 3rd shots
Scott
PS sorry about the drool marks Houghy
on the contrary Scott your 350d is awesome, in the hands of a surgeon is wonderful to see you surgically remove the skies above just for us to see
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 19-02-2006, 09:48 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33
Thanks
The UV/IR filter was used on the 2 and 3rd shots
Scott
PS sorry about the drool marks Houghy
They're great shots Scott, like I've said already, I love them.
I'm just wondering why the use of the UV/IR filter for a modded DSLR?
Is that what's needed for modded cameras?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 19-02-2006, 12:28 PM
venus's Avatar
venus (Lydia)
AstroNan

venus is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 685
Fine work great detail Scott. Keep us posted.........
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 19-02-2006, 11:11 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
thanks.
Rocket Boy, yes the IR cut filter might stop excess IR light from coming through, however its mainly for refractors, as they focus IR light slightly differently, resulting in bloated star images if no filter is used. That doesnt happen with refector scopes.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 19-02-2006, 11:15 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33
thanks.
Rocket Boy, yes the IR cut filter might stop excess IR light from coming through, however its mainly for refractors, as they focus IR light slightly differently, resulting in bloated star images if no filter is used. That doesnt happen with refector scopes.
Scott

How about SCTs Scott?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement