Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-07-2011, 06:17 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,471
Another h-alpha lagoon...

Greg's image of the Lagoon caught my interest as I imaged it a few weeks ago with the same sensor, though a much smaller scope.

I didn't have the time for a marathon effort.... just 20 minutes infact.

What surprised me was the S/N is still pretty good, despite way less photons coming down the pipe.

I've posted the image in HD res, so yo'all can have a good look

The link is here.

Last edited by Peter Ward; 14-07-2011 at 06:24 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-07-2011, 06:21 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Nice contrast - cool.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-07-2011, 07:16 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Lovely field of view. Some minor noise present but with only 20 minutes of data I am impressed with the minimal amount of noise. I think I prefer this field of view over Greg's and your previous version too.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-07-2011, 07:30 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,471
Thanks Marc, Paul.

Just to be clear, I'm not trying to take any wind out of Greg's CDK sails....but I agree, many objects are sensitive to how they are framed, which usually means a different focal length and aperture to capture varying objects in their entirety (though high quality extenders or reducers can indeed make a single scope very versatile)

Smaller apertures are hardly fatal with CCD's....you just have to take longer exposures, but it seems, not that much longer!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-07-2011, 08:15 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Smaller apertures are hardly fatal with CCD's....you just have to take longer exposures, but it seems, not that much longer!
Know what your saying mate. TSA, needs looonnng exposures. Still does a great job for a 4" though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-07-2011, 10:46 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Surprisingly similar given the aperture and exposure difference.

Refractor FOV is still a very appealling view for many objects.

A very nice image.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-07-2011, 02:06 PM
marco's Avatar
marco (Marco Lorenzi)
Registered User

marco is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 933
Agree with Greg, surprising result for such a short exposure and "small" aperture. Your camera seems to work very well too with very low noise..

Clear Skies
Marco
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-07-2011, 05:15 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by marco View Post
Agree with Greg, surprising result for such a short exposure and "small" aperture. Your camera seems to work very well too with very low noise..

Clear Skies
Marco
Thanks Marco. By the way... your deep sky work is simply excellent

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Surprisingly similar given the aperture and exposure difference.

Refractor FOV is still a very appealling view for many objects.

A very nice image.

Greg.
Yes, it's a remarkable level of detail given the exposure time. Then again the AP155 is probably the best 6" refractor ever made IMHO, so I guess I shouldn't have been surprised!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-07-2011, 05:31 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
A very clean image Peter. Well done.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement