Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-02-2005, 09:20 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Bird - astra image?

Hey Anthony.

I've donwloaded Astra Image and Gimp to try this split/deconvolution/recombine that you do.

I tried it with a Jupiter image from the 19th January, that I re-processed in registax this morning. This one turned out better than my previous processing, thanks to creating reference frame and a bit better technique.

Here's my original (after processing):




Now, I loaded it into Astra Image, did a "split" which created the RED/BLUE/GREEN images, and then on each image I did a "Lucy Richardson Deconvolution".

I then did a "Recombine", choosing the red/green/blue, and this is the result.



Obviously, it doesn't look that great with some processing artifacts around the edge.

I used the default parameters for the LR deconv..

What am I doing wrong?
Can you explain the exact steps (and parameters) you use when processing a planetary image, such as you did to my recent jupiter on CN the other day?

Thanks heaps.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2005, 10:05 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I also just tried it with my Saturn image from 31/01/2005..

It came out a bit better (I think), without the artifacts around the edge.. I applied pretty much the exact same technique as per the Jupiter above.

Is it any better, or have I been looking at it too long?

Original:




After AstraImage:
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (20050131-saturn-ai.jpg)
7.2 KB71 views
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2005, 01:13 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Well, try changing the LR parameters away from their default. The better your original images (i.e. the sharper they are) the smaller the LR radius should be.

So, the default radius is 2, but did you try 1.7 or 1.5 to compare?

Also try changing the number of turns, so try 5 instead of 10.

It's all trial and error, cause the magic values for these parameters depend on the quality of your original.

btw the hard ring-like edge to your reprocessed shot shows that the LR has done too much and added artifacts.

regards, Bird
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2005, 01:39 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
I think I have found you the ultimate saturn fixer...
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1563923335.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2005, 02:33 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Thanks Anthony i'll give that a go.

At what stage in the processing do you use astraimage? After stacking? Do you do wavelets in registax first and then deconvol, or do you deconvol and then do wavelets?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-2005, 06:08 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
I use astra image after I finish with Registax wavelets and save the image.

My order is:

registax
astra image
gimp (if needed, to add text etc).

cheers, Bird
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement