Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-10-2010, 06:10 PM
Irish stargazer's Avatar
Irish stargazer (John)
Registered User

Irish stargazer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 690
Triffid using autoguiding

Hi

This is my first attempt at autoguiding. I used a DFK colour camera on the back of a C11 using phd guiding. The image was taken with a Megrez 72 and Canon 450d with a CLS filter attached. I only managed 6 x 7 minutes frames befoe the weather moved in . Taken from the MPAS site at the Briars,Mornington, last night.
I think I may need a more sensitive guider as the colour camera struggled to find guide stars. Anyone using the Orion Solitaire?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Triffid Nebula 9 Oct.JPG)
147.0 KB75 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2010, 06:17 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
Quite good tracking just adjust your colour saturation a bit
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2010, 06:56 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Color camera will be less sensitive than a mono, backing onto a f11 scope is a big ask for a guide camera, usually one tries to guide with a small fast scope..... Ie I use a 88 mm megrez at f5.6 with 1-2 sec updates. Away from the galactic plane also makes it harder to find nice guidestars.

As for the image, nicely centered, and it seems to be tracked well enough, bit more saturation would be aesthetically more pleasing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2010, 07:30 PM
Irish stargazer's Avatar
Irish stargazer (John)
Registered User

Irish stargazer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 690
Hi

I had planned to use the WO72 to guide the C11 at F6.3 but the weather became bad before I could try it. Would this be too bit a gap in focal length to get good results?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2010, 08:33 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish stargazer View Post
Hi

I had planned to use the WO72 to guide the C11 at F6.3 but the weather became bad before I could try it. Would this be too bit a gap in focal length to get good results?
No, the phd program will determine the centroid which is sub pixel, so will be fine. Your problem really is finding guidestars, if you are in melbourne amongst the light pollution it becomes more difficult.

With all guiding at focal lengths of 1500 mm or greater, attention to detail becomes more important, your alignment, focus everything is more critical, but the reward is stunning detail.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2010, 05:51 PM
Irish stargazer's Avatar
Irish stargazer (John)
Registered User

Irish stargazer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 690
I have increased the saturation a bit below. Hopefully this looks better. Its hard to tell when processing on an older laptop.

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4086/...852c87e6_b.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2010, 05:54 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
That's a nicer rendition John. There seems to be camera sag as the eggie stars to the left of the field. Great effort for a small scope !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement