Wow... to mention a plasma universe without talking about charge separation, current, magnetic fields, birkeland currents once... and to rely on acoustic properties only? absolutely bizarre...
Has this guy even read Alfven or
Peratt?
Quote:
380000 years later, when the plasma has cooled enough for neutral hydrogen to survive.
|
The 'plasma' are a "hot gas" analogies are where it all regularly comes unstuck...
http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~bmg/papers/stories/301Gaensler-3.pdf
The universe is clearly observed as magnetic and full of charge separation, why do they continue to use the "hot gas" analogies and ignore the role of charge separation, and not even mention birkeland currents?
http://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma-Universe.com
Ahwell I suppose atleast they use the word "plasma".... just need to now use the properties of the state... then they'll be able to do away with this Dark Matter, Dark Energy nonsense, by using lab verified filamentary forming properties, that continue to be OBSERVED!
Thanks for the link... good to see the gradual adoption of 'plasma' terminology, even if not entirely as Alfven describes.