Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-11-2009, 11:08 PM
5ash's Avatar
5ash (Philip)
Earthling

5ash is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hunter valley. nsw
Posts: 1,117
Skywatcher vs GSO newtonians

I am looking at getting a new telescope with more aperture for astrophotography . Has anyone any comments about 10" optical tubes from the above manufacturers. The GSO scopes seem to have more and are cheaper but are the skywatchers a better buy?? Are there are any other fast F ratio scopes i should consider . I have a NEQ6 mount to mount the scope.
philip
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-11-2009, 11:13 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
i think the optics are pretty much all the same. I have a 12" SW Collapsible Dob and its awesome. It comes down to what eyepieces you use and seeing conditions etc.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2009, 06:53 AM
chris lewis
Registered User

chris lewis is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: auckland
Posts: 191
Yes when I was in the market for an 8 in E.Q. Newt. I looked at the GSO and S.W. Very similar optics and build qualities. I actually got the GSO as it had a Crayford focuser and the S.W. had a basic R. and P. focuser at the time.
I have had 2x previous GSO Newts. and they have proved reliable and accurate. The GSO mirrors appear to have consistent Q. and A.
One of them was a 8 in F/4 which after some adaptaion was good for A.P. although I never really went down this path. GSO do sell a modified F/4 version for A.P. - larger diagonal, different focuser etc. But then again you want a 10 in. Orion also sells a 190 mm F.5.3 Mak. Newt. which is apparently excellent for A.P. I viewed through one at Sirius Optics in Brisbane and the image was flat. Build quality was excellent. There are reviews here and on the web on these.
Really however I believe the S.W. and G.S.O. both offer good quality for the price. My current S.W. Equinox 120ED has excellent optical and build qualities.


Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2009, 01:04 AM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
Optically they seem 50/50. GSO has better fixtures and fittings IMHO. Also they tend to be cheaper, but doubt you'd go wrong with either.
PJH
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-11-2009, 06:48 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
well ill give you some heads up about the SW/GSO, GSO is not better in build qualitys not by a fair shot i know this due to a friend of mine having one and seeing them side by side, the difference lays in the tube construction and collmination system. as for the mirrors. they are pretty much on par with each other, but with the substrate bing substantially different. one is made with normal glass, the other with pyrex glass. minimizing the mirror changing shape due to temperature.

With either of the telescopes. instantly go and purchase a high quality focuser. do not buy the GSO/Bintel 10:1 they are Cr4p! and will not hold a canon 40d at 800grams.! look at a minimum of Moonlight,JMI or Feathertouch.

out of the box, the SW focuser is alright and will hold your camera but itsn't the best by a long shot after SW decided to make the 2" interface a seperate piece! grrr...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement