#1  
Old 26-02-2009, 03:40 AM
Emanuele's Avatar
Emanuele
Registered User

Emanuele is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 180
M33 - 25 min

Dear all,

I didn't want to process this 5, 5 minutes subs, for a total of 25 minutes, of M33 that I got the other night.
It was very low on the horizon.
Anyway, didn't have much to do yesterday night and couldn't sleep so I thought I would give it a go at processing, but the data is not enough at all!

5 x 5 minutes
Pentax 125 SDP
SXVF-M25C
Em200 guided with mini Borg 50

Bigger image (1500px)
http://www.backyardskies.com/Backyar...formation.html

Smaller preview:
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M33_25m_Framed_.jpg)
79.3 KB58 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-02-2009, 07:24 AM
spearo's Avatar
spearo (Frank)
accepts all donations

spearo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Braidwood (outskirts)
Posts: 2,281
Looks fine to me
obviously more subs will enhance the s/n and smooth out the galactic arms but looks great as is
cheers
frank
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-02-2009, 11:21 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Hi Emmanuele, Looks a pretty respectable image. Longer almost always give better results but time constraints always come into play. You can always add more data to the image at a later date.
Still a very nice image.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-02-2009, 04:23 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,182
Very nice shot for little exposure time. Your Pentax 125 I believe is a fantastic scope and the MX25C is a proven performer.

A couple of tips.

One shot colour cameras generally have quite a bit lower QE (sensitivity) than mono. The mono version of your chip is probably around 60% QE (percentage of photons converted to electrons) whereas the colour chip is probably more like 26%.

What this means is that you will get a lot more noise in the dim areas of the image.

For example if you take one of your images taken so far and zoom right in on a dim area you will see lots of M and M type red green blue dots that are colour noise.

The way around this is:

1. Take the longest exposure time you can for your tracking before stars go eggy - like 15-25 minutes. This gives the signal a chance to build up slowly and get past the noise levels.

2. Keep in mind this factor of colour noise in the dim areas so if you are working out exposure time go as long as you can on dim objects and you can go shorter only on bright objects. So brighter objects will come out nicer than dim objects.

3. Always slam the camera down to the maximum cooling it will go to.
You can select adaptive darks when processing if you get an odd temp like -22C. Its better than getting them all at -15C and more noise. -35C is a good temp for CCD chips generally speaking. This will be hard to achieve in Florida so whatever you can get the lower the better. Perhaps consider water cooling assist to get that extra 10C cooling. It'd be worth it.
I had an STL11 one shot colour and at -35C it started to sing but it was a bit croaky at -15C so to speak.

This factor of colour noise in the dim areas is probably the main constraint with one shot colour cameras and that is the best solution - minimum 15 min subexposures and 20 - 30min if your tracking is up to it.

Its a matter of knowing the limitations of your gear and working around them to get the best results.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement