Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-11-2008, 05:15 PM
DJ N
Registered User

DJ N is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 423
Is ED100 f9 too slow for deep sky AP?

Hi all,

I have heard and read lots of favourable reports regarding the Orion/Synta ED100. Has anyone here used them for deep sky astrophotography at f9?? Is this too "slow" a f ratio for DSLR photography? I suppose the thing that appeals to me is the 900mm focal length would give a good image scale on a lot of deep sky objects.

Look forward to some replies!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-11-2008, 05:31 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
it is rather slow but not impossible with a well tracking mount. you can always use a focal reducer and get it down to around 5.6.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-11-2008, 05:50 PM
monoxide's Avatar
monoxide
Registered User

monoxide is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 658
yep, f9 is getting fairly slow but like Mick says its possible and people still get good results, you just need to expose for longer.

i just posted a M42 shot that was taken through the tak at F8 with my QHY8's gain at 1 (lowest possible) so mabee that will give you some idea?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-11-2008, 06:02 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
No it isn't
All the f ratio determines is the image scale. If you put a focal reducer on you just get a smaller image of what you photographing. The light is more concentrated resulting in less exposure time. This is OK for wide field images of nebs etc but not for anything that is a bit smaller. If you only ever want to image the orion neb or similar size items then the faster scope would be beter. At 800mm it is still hardly a long focal length and tracking and guideing should be easy on any decent mount.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-11-2008, 06:12 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
I would say - no.

Just needs higher ISO/ASAs or longer exposures.

Last edited by Ian Robinson; 19-11-2008 at 01:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-11-2008, 10:20 PM
DJ N
Registered User

DJ N is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 423
Thanks for the comments guys.

From my understanding, the focal length of the scope would determine how "accurate" the guiding would need to be, whereas the focal ratio would determine exposure time. For instance f9 versus f7.5 would mean 1.44 times the exposure to obtain the 'same' exposure at a given ISO. I think this makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-11-2008, 10:52 PM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
You're right Daniel .... the focal ratio describes the speed of the lens i.e. the smaller the focal ratio, the brighter the image produced by the lens, the shorter the exposure required.

As Mick said you can use a reducer to widen the fov and thus increase the speed of the lens.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement