#1  
Old 07-10-2008, 03:39 PM
suma126's Avatar
suma126 (Shane)
Registered User

suma126 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: busselton WA
Posts: 738
milkyway

HI can any one tell me how to get more rounded stars .because the big bright stars are a odd shape thanks
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (e300 072.jpg)
151.8 KB71 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2008, 03:59 PM
cookie8's Avatar
cookie8 (Vincent)
Hooked since Halley's

cookie8 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Baulkham Hills,NSW
Posts: 790
HI Shane
That's interesting.I've not seen this field-rotation-like effect before. They doesn't look like coma either.??
I presume it was a piggyback DSLR shot on top of a motorised polar-aligned equatorial mounted refractor ( I can see the dew shield). How long did you exposed it for?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2008, 04:05 PM
cookie8's Avatar
cookie8 (Vincent)
Hooked since Halley's

cookie8 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Baulkham Hills,NSW
Posts: 790
That's field rotation of a fork mount SCT if that's what you've piggybacked on. Solution are either a wedge or a field derotator.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2008, 04:23 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Hi Shane, to IceInSpace!

Vincent is right - if you're piggybacking on an alt/az fork mount, you'll get field rotation like that. You'll need to get an EQ mount, or a wedge for your fork.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2008, 04:45 PM
suma126's Avatar
suma126 (Shane)
Registered User

suma126 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: busselton WA
Posts: 738
milky way

I did have a meade lx90 on a polar mount .camera is a olympus e300 with a small fish eye lens attached .exp 1x7 min was not auto guided
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-10-2008, 05:22 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Hi Shane,

The problem is polar alignment, if it's off slightly you'll still get field rotation. Try for shorter subs and stack them.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-10-2008, 05:39 PM
suma126's Avatar
suma126 (Shane)
Registered User

suma126 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: busselton WA
Posts: 738
THANKS for all you help but have sold my meade lx90 and just waiting for my toy losmandy gm8 hope fully it will track better.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-10-2008, 07:34 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Shane - No doubt about it, a GM8 will track better than an LX90
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:05 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Interesting effect Shane.

What type of camera did you use?

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement