Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-08-2008, 10:35 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
DBK31 first light.. Jupiter 30-08-08 Brisbane.

Took me 4 or 5 days to get a first light image with this camera due to the weather It brought with it...

It took me a bit of mucking around to find a codec that looked any good (and I still dont know if i got it right...) but RGB32 came up looking the best, so from there, I ran off about 13x 90sec AVI's most of which were ruined by the less than optimal seeing.. however these 2 images were clearly better than the rest...

The color isnt right.. I think I had the saturation too high in IC Capture..

IC Capture is not as user friendly as K3CCD in my opinion... more powerful in its options, but not as easy to use.

Enough jibba jabba.... Pics.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (08-08-30.jpg)
84.5 KB69 views
Click for full-size image (08-08-30_3.jpg)
143.0 KB100 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-08-2008, 10:51 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
Alex, that looks excellent. I dont think i have seen equatorial detail before in a image taken with a 8" scope. And the same goes for the detail in the GRS.

Edit:
Wait hold on a second is this with your 8" or C11?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-08-2008, 10:51 PM
madtuna's Avatar
madtuna (Steve)
an overactive imagination

madtuna is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Erlistoun WA
Posts: 592
look fine to me Al...is that the mono with filters or the colour DBK?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-08-2008, 11:11 PM
cookie8's Avatar
cookie8 (Vincent)
Hooked since Halley's

cookie8 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Baulkham Hills,NSW
Posts: 790
Awesome details! Seeing we can only dream of!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-08-2008, 11:16 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Fahim, That was with the 8" newtonian... The C11 is paid for but i am still rather impatiently waiting for stock..

Steve, DBK color...

Thanks for the comments

I just did some reading and found out I was using the wrong codec after all.. I should be using Y800 and debayer it in registax... well, at least I know for next time...

heres a re-do of the second image, just tweaked the colors a touch and tried to bring the noise level down.. I have to push the gain pretty hard with the 8" at over 6m focal lenght..
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (08-08-30_3_redo.jpg)
112.6 KB57 views
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-08-2008, 11:24 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,816
Excellent stuff Alex - really nice shots mate! All these terrific Jupiters of late has forced me to voyage deeper into our Solar System so tonight, I’m trying to grab the (brighter) moons of Uranus.

On my way to Uranus, I did grab a few AVI’s of Jupiter with the DBK21 so I’ll post them later for a comparison.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-08-2008, 11:25 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
i might be able to have a go at the deeper solar system when my C11 arrives... point it at Uranus see what I can get.. If the DBK cant capture it, the QHY8 probably will..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-08-2008, 11:30 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,816
Yeah – I’m shooting 10 secs with a x4 PowerMate. That’s F12 x4 = F48 in the Mewlon and the quantum efficiency of the SBIG ST7E makes it feasible. The DMK and DBK picked up almost no signal at F48.

I can definitely see 4 moons on screen, albeit very dim; just a few ADU above the background.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-08-2008, 11:37 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
mmm... Mind you I was pleasently surprised by the DBK tonight... whilst waiting for Jupiter to get high enough to image, I was toying with the long exposure settings in IC capture.. Took a 30sec shot of M20 that actually showed quite alot of nebulosity, and in the right colors too.. M8 produced better results.. being bigger/brighter I guess..

I might have a better play with it next time I'm out.. get 10 subs and stack them up.. see how it goes...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31-08-2008, 12:08 AM
astro_south's Avatar
astro_south (Andrew)
No GOTO..I enjoy the hunt

astro_south is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,094
Great shot Alex - lots of detail
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31-08-2008, 12:50 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,628
Very nice detail Alex.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31-08-2008, 06:33 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Great image Alex! Well done. Excellent first light.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31-08-2008, 08:28 AM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Great Jup images Alex. Were you using the 5x powermate?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31-08-2008, 09:51 AM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Nice job Alex.

I will give you a score of 9.15 with a degree of dificulty of 3.2...lol

I have been watching too much Olympics.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 31-08-2008, 09:52 AM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Excellent first light Alex, very well done.

Lots of detail and great image scale.

Once your C11 arrives, I can't wait to see what you produce.

A top effort.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 31-08-2008, 10:06 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Good work, Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 31-08-2008, 11:54 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Thanks so much eveyone,

Peter_4059 : Yeah, that was with the 5x powermate... and thats the standard image scale, not resized at all.

Matty P : Me too Thought I should get a few more images out of the 8" before it goes into the garage never to be seen again... or sold....


Thanks again everyone.

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 31-08-2008, 04:54 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Sorry for going slightly off topic but Alex, what made you decide that you wanted a C11 over a 12" Newt or similar?

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 31-08-2008, 05:51 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
manageability Matt... A 24kg, 1.5m long OTA is a hassle and a half. a 12.4kg 60cm long OTA isn't a worry in the world. Price of the Newt was attractive, but add in the cost of custom made rings / couple of extra counter weights etc. etc.. Sure its not $3600 but its still getting up there. Collimation is something that even after having done it a few times now, its still annoying to have to do it regularly, and tricky at times..

Finally I also wanted whichever large aperture scope I bought to be used for visual work/planetary imaging and DSO imaging. A 12" Newt on an EQ6 is not an observers dream, and DSO imaging would be out of the question due to the weight of the tube alone being right on the EQ6's limit. guide scope/camera/guide cam etc etc.. you're asking for headaches.. And for DSO's you need to shorten the tube in order to reach focus, however for planetary/observing, that modification is not exactly the best of plans...

It finally came down to the choice of a Meade 12" LX200 ACF or the Celestron C11. Meade = more expensive/heavier and according to many reviews, whilst they are great scopes, the quality compared to the C11 is somewhat lacking...

The 11" SCT + guide scope/guide cam/QHY8/side by side bar etc comes in lighter than the 12" OTA alone.

It was a tough decision... but I am quite sure I've made the right decision based on budget and planed useage of the scope...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 31-08-2008, 06:51 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
I totally understand where you are coming from Alex. Although the 12" Newt's aperture and pricing is a big plus you just can't beat simplicity and ease of use. A 20kg 12" Newtonian OTA just doesn't allow for that.

My future plans is to upgrade to a larger SCT when funds allow and from the reviews that I have read, they are great scopes. I still love my C8 though.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement