Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-01-2008, 09:37 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
NGC1360 Planetary Nebula

Hi Guys,

found some data that i forgot to process. it is NGC1360 a faint but biggish PN. was taken 6/1/08.

Only got 3 x 5 minutes at ISO 400 as i remember, it was due west where my neighbours tree got in the way.


Hi Res here:

http://www.ezystyles.com.au/gallery2..._itemId=432073

Cheers
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc1360_1 copy.jpg)
64.6 KB85 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-01-2008, 10:09 AM
AJames
Southern Amateur

AJames is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
Enjoyed This One...

Love the gorgeous subtle green and blue colours in the nebulosity. Seen heaps of images of this wonderful planetary, but never the different contrasts across the planetary disk.

I think you will find the magnitude of the nebulosity is not 14th but is more like either 11.6v and 11.5B magnitude.

Considering the brightness of this object, it remains extraordinary that it was discovered so late by Lewis Swift in 1857. You should note that the central 9th magnitude blue star is not the central star of the nucleus, but is the one below it - being 11.35v or 10.96B magnitude.

The red star is RZ For - a semi-regular variable star, and is near maximum brightness at 8.4v magnitude. The blue star also makes a nice contrast - often not placed in the image field in preference to the planetary.

I really like this pic Eric.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-01-2008, 10:36 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,428
Wished I had some data like that!!! nice work Eric. Must see if Scott as imaged it?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-01-2008, 12:15 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
A good image for such short exposures.

I would go back to this object for more data in the future as there is a wealth of information such as the Ha emission on the right hand boundary of the PN not found in your image.

Also, and I hope I am not being picky, but the visual magnitude of the PN is around 9.4, not 14.0 as displayed in your title. NGC 1360 is one of the brighter of the larger PNs.

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-01-2008, 12:21 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
A nice capture Eric, I also enjoyed the blue/green hues.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-01-2008, 12:23 PM
edwardsdj's Avatar
edwardsdj (Doug)
Doug Edwards

edwardsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
Another nice image Eric
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-01-2008, 05:58 PM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,403
I agree with Steven the mag is about 9.4. It is easy to see with 20x80 binoculars.
Kent Wallace lists it as mag 9.6 and 460" x 320".
http://www.blackskies.org/intro.html#Files

Last edited by glenc; 24-01-2008 at 06:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-01-2008, 08:59 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
cheers guys thanks. I use starry night for my object info. it states it is mag 14.0 in it. I wish i can obtain more data but has done to west now where my neighbours tree has blocked it . till next year
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-01-2008, 09:34 AM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
You have done a lovely job on this one Eric. Nicely composed and nice star colors add nicely to the whole image.
cheers Gary
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-01-2008, 12:44 PM
Antu's Avatar
Antu
Registered User

Antu is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by EzyStyles View Post
Hi Guys,
found some data that i forgot to process. it is NGC1360 a faint but biggish PN. was taken 6/1/08.
Although the object is quite difficult to catch, you've done great job ! I am just wondering - why do you shoot at ISO400 ? Isn't the dynamic range at ISO800 wide enough ?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-01-2008, 12:14 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
thanks Gary and Ant. cheers. Shooting in ISO400 helps me with my noise and light polluted skies esp with 5 - 7 minute exposures.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement