#1  
Old 31-12-2007, 11:50 AM
solissydney (Ken)
Registered User

solissydney is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Castle Hill Sydney
Posts: 660
Quasar

I seem to remember, from many years ago, that one Quasar should be within reach of amateur telescopes with a camera.
Right???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-12-2007, 12:33 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by solissydney View Post
I seem to remember, from many years ago, that one Quasar should be within reach of amateur telescopes with a camera.
Right???
solissydney, Quasar 3C 273 in Virgo is visible with telescopes from about 8". RA=12 29.1 DEC+02 03.
At about 12.8 mag is the furthest object seen in moderate amateur telescopes.at about 2 billion light years.

It looks like a faint star in an 8" scope.
You do not need a camera to see this object.
Ron

Last edited by astroron; 31-12-2007 at 03:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-12-2007, 12:58 PM
solissydney (Ken)
Registered User

solissydney is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Castle Hill Sydney
Posts: 660
Quasar

Well done Ron thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement