Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-07-2007, 08:12 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,945
Ghost of Jupiter

NGC 3242 taken with a GSTAR-EX through SDM006!

It's my first night out with my new toy, so I don't know what I'm doing. Random settings and the AVI bunged through registax using defaults. A little added contrast, but that's it
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ghostofjupiter.jpg)
52.2 KB114 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-07-2007, 09:11 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Great work . A very suitable target for your FL (2540mm). You've resolved some nice detail in the outer shell. This scope would be dynamite mounted on a large GEM or equatorial tracking platform - produce some exquisite narrowfield images with an AO unit. Looking forward to seeing more of your work.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-07-2007, 09:29 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Wow, thats hard to image, nice work!.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-07-2007, 12:04 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
What a beauty, a great first light for your new toy. I have yet to capture a decent image of the ghost, quite a tricky little beggar.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-07-2007, 05:57 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Excellent work Jonathan! The g-star coupled with that large aperture will let you get some real faint stuff.

Very nice work.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-07-2007, 09:10 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
hey thats realy good!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-07-2007, 09:49 AM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,945
That's about as good as it got for the night - there was a rather large shiny moon after all! It promises to be a fun toy. I'll have to get more scientific tonight.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-07-2007, 10:17 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Nice shot That was one of the first objects I photographed with my ST7.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-07-2007, 01:19 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,945
This one is much better - avi from a second run i had.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (0167-1.jpg)
19.9 KB27 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-07-2007, 01:44 PM
Rodstar's Avatar
Rodstar (Rod)
The Glenfallus

Rodstar is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,702
Just out of interest, Jonathan, how does that object look to your eyes as a visual object through SDM 6?

It is one of the most impressive objects I have seen through my scope. To my eyes, the inner shell looks a turquiose colour, and the outer shell a lilac/light purple colour
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-07-2007, 01:52 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,945
Yeah, it's lovely isn't it!

The camera is much more light sensitive than the eye, so it can get more detail, but on a good night there is still plenty of detail to be seen visually, and in colour for a change.

I have become much more interested in planetaries since getting some serious light gathering ability - I'm planning to see how many I can track down.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-07-2007, 02:15 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Reflecting on this scope further (no pun intended)... it would be a prime candidate for CCD TDI methods as you don't need to guide or at least not very accurately. I suspect a dedicated astro CCD would provide you with more image depth than the g-star, but I haven't had any experience with the latter. Can help out with CCD TDI techniques if desired.
Do you know what the image circle is on the scope?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-07-2007, 03:18 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,945
I've heard of TDI - sounds an interesting technique, and i'll look into it when I have a clue what I'm doing! I was going to have a go at autoguiding tonight to see if any degree of accuracy is possible with ServoCat.

How do I calculate/measure the image circle?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-07-2007, 06:18 PM
Dr Nick's Avatar
Dr Nick (Nick)
www.NicksAstronomy.com

Dr Nick is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Glen Innes, NSW
Posts: 574
Nice shot!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-07-2007, 08:59 PM
skeltz's Avatar
skeltz (Rob)
Registered User

skeltz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: sa
Posts: 355
wow what a nice looking scope!
hmm nice scope ...avater...astrojunk????
anyway mate looks like a very nice toy
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-07-2007, 09:41 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,945
Tonights effort - this time with a barlow making a fl of 5080mm

Max gain and using 128x integration. Processed in registax, 50 frames, default settings with darkframe subtraction. No further modification!

For interest, I've added the colour from hubble to the second image. I hadn't appreciated how asymetrical the outer shell was.

I'm hooked!!!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (0175-1.jpg)
16.7 KB17 views
Click for full-size image (0175-1-hubble.jpg)
53.6 KB23 views
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-07-2007, 09:19 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Magnificent images. 5080mm is stoking it! Your seeing is undoubtedly good or at least your arcsec/pixel combo suits the conditions very well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroJunk View Post
How do I calculate/measure the image circle?
Image circle at the focal plane is defined by two factors. Firstly, the i.d of your focuser. If you’re using a typical 2” (50mm) focuser then obviously you’ll never get an image circle larger than this. Most astrographs have a 3” (76mm) or 4” (101mm) focuser to cater for larger format chips. Secondly, how much of the light is usable or put another way - the flatness of your light path. Commonly, coma in parabolic mirrors distort the edge of the FOV, thus the full light path can’t be utilised without some form of flattener in place. I did have a formula for calculating field flatness in an optical design, but it was based on a refractor’s objectives. As you’d expect, this also depends on chip size. It is typical, that even if you have a large 4" focuser, the image circle will not be 101mm. An example of this is the Takahashi FSQ, it uses a 4" focuser, but the image circle is 88mm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement