Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-08-2021, 10:00 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,677
IC 4628 Prawn Nebula under a Full Moon

Captured IC 4628 Prawn Nebula for only the second time, under a full moon last night using my L Extreme Multiband filter
Beautiful clear night , no wind , no dew but it was like daylight outside with that big full moon overhead

NexDome Obs
8” f5 GSO newt
Skywatcher EQ6-R pro mount
ZWOASI2600MC set in Ascom to highest dynamic range Gain 0 cooled to -10C
Optolong L Extreme OSC multiband filter
65 x 3 minute dithered guided subs
Goto and tracking EQMOD and Ascom Stellarium
Captured in APT
PHD2 Multistar guiding ( 0.80 arc sec error total )
Subs reviewed in Astap
Stacked in DSS
Processed in Startools V1.7 OSC Linear data set

Synthetic Luminance version
Compose Synth L , R ( 2xG ) B OSC version

Comments Welcome
Thanks
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (31FA226F-04D5-4C04-86D3-59CEEE84810C.jpg)
203.8 KB67 views
Click for full-size image (BF8BFD94-D53C-4CDA-9950-91D203C26E9A.jpg)
193.8 KB66 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-08-2021, 08:34 AM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,279
Nice framing & composition Martin!
The dark rings around he stars in the colour version are distracting, maybe worth finding the cause?

B&W version looks pretty good!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-08-2021, 04:17 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,677
Thanks Andy
Appreciate your comments
Yes the Luminance version does give some full depth and detail of the Prawn
In the colour version I created a star mask so as not to include the stars during processing the main objects colour It’s a bad habit of mine as you don’t need too , Startools takes that into account and masks the majority of stars down to a few pixels ( only the teeny weeny faint stars get caught up the colour saturation )
Only when doing OSC Bi colour in Compose you have to mask your stars otherwise they end up with all sorts of unusual colours.
Unfortunately Star Masks do leave a few pixels of background around the perimeter.Some of it does get hidden after Noise Reduction ( in the form of smear )
I must admit though OSC narrowband under a full moon with the fainter nebulas like the Prawn is difficult to process your colour or even extract a suitable bi colour version
Ive had more success with the likes of M8 , M16 , M17 and a few others
Cheers
Martin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-08-2021, 04:28 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Nice one Martin..how good are calm, clear dewless nights??

There looks to be some vignetting?..did you use flats?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-08-2021, 04:53 PM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Startrek View Post
Thanks Andy

In the colour version I created a star mask so as not to include the stars during processing the main objects colour ...
Unfortunately Star Masks do leave a few pixels of background around the perimeter. Some of it does get hidden after Noise Reduction ( in the form of smear )
I used to use Startools, from memory one of the processes - Decon maybe? created dark rings around stars if the setting was too high.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-08-2021, 11:04 AM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Nice one Martin..how good are calm, clear dewless nights??

There looks to be some vignetting?..did you use flats?

Mike
Mike
Thanks for your comments
No I didn’t use flats
I’ve tried various methods to produce good flats at various ADU with my 2600MC , white T Shirt , LED photographic light panel with variable illumination settings etc.. and the various flats I produced don’t really help much with dust donuts and vignetting. A lot of folk with the 2600MC have similar issues obtaining good flats that work.
So I resort to keeping my sensor spotless and use the Vignetting preset in the Gradient Wipe module of Startools
Mistakenly with this image I forgot to use the Vignetting preset and used the Narrowband preset in Wipe ( Vignetting caused by full moon glare )
So to clean up the residual or trace of Vignetting in the image , I reprocessed the image using the Vignetting preset in Wipe
Here it is
Cheers
Martin
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (FAA47F4A-2FB4-4B5A-A76D-531A8F061965.jpg)
197.7 KB23 views
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-08-2021, 11:08 AM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01 View Post
I used to use Startools, from memory one of the processes - Decon maybe? created dark rings around stars if the setting was too high.
Andy
I didn’t use Decon in Startools, I’m sure it’s the L Extreme filter creating this thin halo ring
It doesn’t appear as prominent on other images without the filter
Decon has come a long way in Startools to arrest the ringing around stars etc..

Cheers
Martin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement