Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-02-2007, 01:35 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
DMK - ToUcam Saturn comparison

While I prefer the colour of the ToUcam image, the DMK just leaves it for dead for detail and clarity. These images were all taken over a 25 min period of moderate seeing using identical equipment apart from the cameras and colour wheel. Number of frames captured and initial processing is identical for all greyscale and ToUcam images. Final alignment and combining of the LRGB image was in ImagesPlus. Colour adjustments in PS.

The ToUcam image has had a slight despeckle done to it to soften grain and noise, after levels and colour adjustment, the DMK colour combine has only had levels and slight colour adjustment.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Saturn-CombineChannelTarget_1-framed.jpg)
28.2 KB63 views
Click for full-size image (K3-Saturn_2007-02-05_22-32-58-framed.jpg)
11.6 KB59 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2007, 07:06 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That's a telling difference right there, nice comparison Paul.

You'll work out the colour eventually.. it took me ages to get the colour right with the DMK. Part of it was due to the filters I was using (baader) which just didn't have the right transmission, and the red channel was too dim.

When I upgraded to Astronomik's, the colours came out much more balanced.

What program do you use to recombine? It's also worth noting that in AstraImage (if you use that to recombine), you can change the intensity of each channel to better match the colours... so if your blue channel was dim during capture, you can give it more intensity (eg: 0.9) during recombine to better match the histogram of each channel and get a better rendition when combined.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2007, 08:47 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Thank Mike. I'll be looking for Astronomik filters eventually, but the baader will have to do in the interum.

I used both Astra Image and ImagesPlus to combine and found Images plus better for combining. Images Plus was more adaptable when working out weight of channel, though AI gives more control over image alignment. The hard part is I like Astra Images RC and ME useability more than IPs version. I'll get a workflow sorted sooner or later
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2007, 08:52 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,828
Nice work Paul. Sounds like a lot of processing and balancing - why do we do it eh?

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2007, 08:55 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
It's more fun than watching TV?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement