Thanks Mike and Trish, Aidan, Hugh, Marc, Rick, Rod, H, Marcus, David, Colin and Scott for your comments and opinions. Much appreciated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scheimfluge
Paul.
This is a wonderful rendition of M20. Thank you for your dedication and time you put into this amazing subject. I gather this was taken with the RC 12".The colors are very pleasing to look at.
Geoff
|
Thanks Geoff. It was taken with the RC12". Its been a bit of slog this image. I have started and stopped this 3 times for various reasons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01
Wow! that packs a punch - very 3D and bold.
Maybe some more natural star colours would compliment the neb as well? Maybe it's just me but the bright star at the top is kinda distracting.
That's a cool deep moody M20, well done 
|
Thanks Andy, the star colour is a bit muted but I just don't have enough data to push the saturation much higher at this stage. I plan on gathering more data. Hmm maybe the star is a bit distracting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35
Sensational detail Paul! I have to admit I prefer the more traditional colours but I reckon you have another winner there mate.
Cheers
Steve
|
Thanks Steve, it took me some time to settle on NB colouring, but I hope I have settled on a scheme that I and others like. AOX really makes the detail I think, especially in good seeing it is obvious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Love the way you have accentuated the dusty trifid section. So much detail that its outstanding. The little slug feelers below are rare to see.
A terrific image.
Greg.
|
That slug is upside down in this image but I was surprised to see it myself. I even checked against other images such as Hubble to see if it was real.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward
I struggling with this one Paul.
The high-contrast sky and earthy tones are interesting, but I can't help but think shadow details are being hidden as a result.
The central neb also shows remarkable resolution, but again this is not echoed
by uber-tight stellar footprints and scattering around the brighter stars toward the edge......hallmarks of localized processing
This can be OK but, but I agree with DM.... OK so long as you don't notice it
A good image just the same
P.S.
I'm pining to just get some data..any data.... currently no mount or scope in the dome!
|
Agreed, I fixed both the background and the stellar profiles a bit. I was informed by not only yourself but Martin that the central stars could not be seen in the previous version. I inadvertently forgot to exclude the brighter stars on a contrast enhancement late in the processing. Should not rush things sometimes. I have not done any star shape adjustments at all on this particular image. I understand what it is like not to have equipment running and missing collecting data.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John K
That's outstanding Paul - the most detailed amateur image of this object I have seen - very Hubble like in terms of the colours and also some of the fine filamentary structure you have captured.
|
Thanks John. There are a few more images with better detail but the images either come from Hubble or much larger scopes. This is certainly an outstanding image for detail on this object from a small scope. Very happy with that alone. Bit like getting a good image of Jupiter or Saturn or even Mars and what I had set out to do with this imaging rig.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Excellent Paul, the NB RGB blend is perfect. I get tired of M20, but your rendition is sharper, smoother and has a kind of "solid" colour saturation that is impressive.
|
Thanks Fred, that is sort of what I was aiming for and I did wonder what your thoughts would be as I know you love your NB colour. BTW where is your latest image?