Stock 14 & He 2-72

[jsmoraes (Jorge)]

I searched for nebula. I didn't see the nebula. So, I didn't believe. So, I didn't waste time with. So I did a mistake.

http://www.astrobin.com/184183/

GSO 305 mm - Canon T3 - 6 x 3 min (18 min) - ISO 400 - Skyglow filter - OAG - Coma Corrector


comparative image from http://deepspaceplace.com/maximdltips.php

[jsmoraes (Jorge)]

I found some reference to this nebula here:
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ghlight=he2-72
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ghlight=he2-72

And the best, fantastic, amazing, incredible, wonderful image of this nebula at https://www.flickr.com/photos/astro_...86301/sizes/o/

from IIS mate gvanhau (Geert) - Santiago - Chile

[Tony_ (Tony)]

Nice one Jorge. It's a small faint PN so it's good to get it at all. I like trying these small PNs too!

It's hard sometimes to know for sure what you are getting when these objects aren't visible on the subs.

Tony.

[rustigsmed (Russell)]

wow - great capture Jorge!

[jsmoraes (Jorge)]

Thank you, Russel, but not yet, that time.

Now it was a great effort. The first result:

GSO 305 - Canon T3 - ISO 400 - OAG - Coma corrrector

11 x 240 sec skyglow filter + 21 x 120 sec skyglow filter + overlay of nebula 21 x 240 sec UHC filter

[jsmoraes (Jorge)]

And my last process with 11 x 240 sec skyglow filter + 21 x 120 sec skyglow filter + 21 x 240 sec UHC filter - 130 minutes (2 h 10 m) in DSS.

Despite of this photo has more 44 minutes, I don't see enhancement of quality in the final result. I can not tell what photo has the better and true shape of nebula. I only enhanced what I saw in the photo.

note: sorry, this more wide field is bigger than 200k. You can see it here:
http://astronomia-e-astrofotos.10697...604-130min.jpg

[rustigsmed (Russell)]

nice, I like the wider field. its like a trail of stars meandering up to the PN.

Cheers