Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-12-2014, 02:32 PM
DJScotty's Avatar
DJScotty (Scott)
Registered User

DJScotty is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
Rosette no stars (very few anyway)

Thought I would have a crack at removing the stars in Ha in preparation for RGB imaging during Xmas break.

Advice and assistance welcomed!

http://www.astrobin.com/140918/

Thanks for looking
DJ Scotty
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (rosette Ha no stars2 small.jpg)
52.4 KB47 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-12-2014, 03:30 PM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
Hi Scott,

There are some very large dust motes visible in your image. Did you apply flats to your calibration? Just could not help but notice them.

j
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-12-2014, 11:58 PM
DJScotty's Avatar
DJScotty (Scott)
Registered User

DJScotty is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
No I haven't. That big one in the right corner is gone now. It was on the glass of the camera.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-12-2014, 12:34 AM
Garbz (Chris)
Registered User

Garbz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 646
No advice on removing stars since I'm a novice at that, good work by the way.

However that vertical line, is that a satellite passing through? How are you stacking the images and how many subs do you have? If you have a couple of subs then maybe tweaking the rejection settings while stacking (lower the Sigma High value I think) may be able to completely eliminate the satellite.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-12-2014, 09:36 AM
DJScotty's Avatar
DJScotty (Scott)
Registered User

DJScotty is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
Thanks Chris
Unfortunately not a satellite. Column of dead pixels on the sensor. Have had several suggestions by various IIS members. They work to some extent. When the final image is finished will have to remove them by hand in Photoshop...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-12-2014, 10:39 AM
Garbz (Chris)
Registered User

Garbz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 646
Drizzling (small movements between frames) may be your only solution for sensor defects
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-12-2014, 12:34 PM
DJScotty's Avatar
DJScotty (Scott)
Registered User

DJScotty is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
Yes. I do dither when using Nebulosity in conjunction with PHD. Alas, the columns still persist. Thank you for the suggestion though...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-12-2014, 05:57 PM
Garbz (Chris)
Registered User

Garbz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 646
Yes dither is what I meant. Interesting. Have you had a look at the subs to see if the dead pixels overlap between any subsequent subs? If you dither enough that the row of dead pixels is different on each sub then I'm back to suggesting modifying the sigma high value doing image integration.

Removing defects like this is exactly what that algorithm is designed for. It should only fail if there are multiple subs with the same defect, then then defect becomes closer to the average and a lower sigma value is needed to average it out.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-12-2014, 10:00 PM
DJScotty's Avatar
DJScotty (Scott)
Registered User

DJScotty is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
Ok. Without sounding silly, is this a Deep Sky Stacker only thing or can Nebulosity do it as well?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement