#1  
Old 12-08-2014, 03:10 PM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
Sad day,for VH-OGG

Very sad day,with the passing of VH-OGG,a Qantas Boeing 767.

Left Sydney today for the last time for the American desert scrap yard.Such a shame to see less Boeing aircraft these days in out skies.The aircraft Boeing make are so much better than anything else.The Boeing 767 is one of their very finest aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2014, 03:17 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
I used to have some patients who were ground engineers with Qantas, and they all said Boeing built the best planes.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2014, 03:45 PM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larryp View Post
I used to have some patients who were ground engineers with Qantas, and they all said Boeing built the best planes.
Yes Larry,the people at the service center in Brisbane,said the same-and the 767 is very reliable .

Many years ago,a Canadian 767 ran out of fuel mid flight! and ended up gliding many miles and landing safely,on an old runway.The pilot was a very good glider pilot (perhaps the main thing that saved all)-he somehow flew the plane side-ways to slow it down!,and then had knowledge of the old runway-only to find it had been turned into a race track-and was in use!

Was the first boeing that had liters instead of gallons,the fuel crew made a mistake,the flight crew did not pick up on it,there were some other reasons for near mishap.

Anyhow-that Canadian 767 is still in use! after all that time,and no nose gear landing-they call it 'the Gilmor glider' (after the old runway)

Will be a very sad day when there are no more of these beautiful planes left in Qantas fleet.Must be a wired feeling for the crew on this last flight of OGG (an all female crew on this last flight) hope Qantas can afford to give them tickets to get back home.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2014, 04:01 PM
PeterEde (Peter)
Prince Planet

PeterEde is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
Never worked commercial aircraft. My plane was the venerable P3 and she's headed for the scrap pile too over the next few years. replaced by a hybrid 737 with 767 wings Pfft twin turbine to replace 4 turbo props. Talk about fish out of water. Still the P8 is a nice plane. I guess one day it'll meet all requirements
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2014, 04:24 PM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterEde View Post
Never worked commercial aircraft. My plane was the venerable P3 and she's headed for the scrap pile too over the next few years. replaced by a hybrid 737 with 767 wings Pfft twin turbine to replace 4 turbo props. Talk about fish out of water. Still the P8 is a nice plane. I guess one day it'll meet all requirements
Yes Peter,the P3 is such a fantastic aircraft for our defence force! be years before it goes-that wedgetail certainly has issues! the U.S came out to help with search of W.A for MH 370,but soon went home as the hybrid 737 was completely useless.

Good old Orion never missed a beat! apparently they can can be run for 24 hrs in air-on one engine,when needed-how amazing are they! Our poor defence forces will have lots completely useless aircraft for the next few decades ahead.:
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2014, 04:39 PM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,068
My plane was the venerable P3

Mine to ( 75 - 78 492 Sqn ) ... The ' B ' Variant .. .. P3B Orion ( Allison T56 Turbo Prop )
I can still remember the ' horsepower rating at the torque shaft ' .... 14,000 ponies at the planetary Gearbox.... ... how would you like to own a CAR with 14,000 HP at the Diff....

Shame about Qantas VH-OGG

Flash .....

Last edited by FlashDrive; 12-08-2014 at 10:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2014, 08:06 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotspur View Post
Yes Larry,the people at the service center in Brisbane,said the same-and the 767 is very reliable .

Many years ago,a Canadian 767 ran out of fuel mid flight! and ended up gliding many miles and landing safely,on an old runway.The pilot was a very good glider pilot (perhaps the main thing that saved all)-he somehow flew the plane side-ways to slow it down!,and then had knowledge of the old runway-only to find it had been turned into a race track-and was in use!

Was the first boeing that had liters instead of gallons,the fuel crew made a mistake,the flight crew did not pick up on it,there were some other reasons for near mishap.

Anyhow-that Canadian 767 is still in use! after all that time,and no nose gear landing-they call it 'the Gilmor glider' (after the old runway)

Will be a very sad day when there are no more of these beautiful planes left in Qantas fleet.Must be a wired feeling for the crew on this last flight of OGG (an all female crew on this last flight) hope Qantas can afford to give them tickets to get back home.
Forgive me, the pilot in me is going to play devil's advocate.

Re the Gimli Glider (the correct name for the incident sorry) - yes, a famous incident (fuel is measured in kilograms or pounds - the weight was incorrect and there was also a system fault and later complete loss of EFIS after the double flame out), but nothing overly outstanding. See the fairly recent A330 of Air Transat that glided 135 nautical miles dry.

Additionally, the Gimli Glider, C-GAUN, is similarly retired to the Mojave Complex (2008).

All aircraft, regardless of manufacturer have a glide ability, some better than others. The glide ratio determines the distance covered per altitude. Also, the sideslip maneuvre that was done at both Gimli and in the Azores is nothing unusual at all - its not flying sideways, moreso it is flying with the leading wing down, and the aircraft skewed off "centreline", so that a high proportion of drag is created, enabling loss of altitude and speed (unless the nose is dropped). It is a VERY common technique in older aircraft that do not have flaps (and aircraft that lose hydraulics due to things like flame outs ) - I routinely did it in the Tiger Moth to lose height, and can be in combination with S turns as well. The sideslip is not particularly stressful on the airframe, but some aircraft have sideslip limitations, more to do with rudder authority due to blanketing than anything.

The 767 was a decent aircraft, but the A330 is somewhat cheaper and just as good, if not more economic. I love Boeing, but Airbus is just fine too

Not sure about lack of Boeing in Australian skies - see plenty of damned 737's...

Only 3 Boeing airliners I truly love -
1. 727 - a REAL aeroplane!
2. 757 - rocket! I love riding that one whenever I can, though sadly they too are on the way out
3. 777 - just one hell of an aeroplane. Of course, being a predominately McDonell-Douglas designed aircraft (which Boeing admits to - seeing they incorporated the McDD design team after the take-over)

There used to be a saying, If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going. I wish we could still say If it ain't Douglas, I ain't going - DIESEL FOREVER! (and the Mad Dog too )
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2014, 08:44 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,478
For those of us that aren't pilots, the rest of us just like low noise, decent leg room and spacious toilets

In years gone by I've spent far too much time on transcontinentals(US) and there be no shedding of tears from me the 767...the A320 and newer 737s are just a more comfortable experience
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2014, 10:22 PM
PeterEde (Peter)
Prince Planet

PeterEde is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotspur View Post
Yes Peter,the P3 is such a fantastic aircraft for our defence force! be years before it goes-that wedgetail certainly has issues! the U.S came out to help with search of W.A for MH 370,but soon went home as the hybrid 737 was completely useless.

Good old Orion never missed a beat! apparently they can can be run for 24 hrs in air-on one engine,when needed-how amazing are they! Our poor defence forces will have lots completely useless aircraft for the next few decades ahead.:
2018 will see the last retired off. Starting the withdrawal next year from the main fleet. Already scrapped a few B models and a AP3C is stripped and on the tarmac now waiting the crusher.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-08-2014, 08:13 AM
stephenb's Avatar
stephenb (Stephen)
Registered User

stephenb is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: all over the shop...
Posts: 2,098
OGG and OGO are my favorites. I travell(ed) on them often over the years.

I still see OGO taxiing past me in MEL - yesterday in fact. My favorite aircraft.

I saw OGG only a fortnight ago Its last famous livery was 'Planes'.

Also sad to see the once busy Qantas Mainenance Base at Melbourne just a ghost town.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (img7168-20131126-1213-12000800 (VH-OGG QF453 MEL-SYD dep MEL).jpg)
137.5 KB26 views

Last edited by stephenb; 13-08-2014 at 08:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement