Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-08-2006, 04:43 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
best jupiter in the world :rolleyes:

here we go...
taken last night, seeing was really bad (2-3/10)
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (j1.jpg)
12.4 KB67 views
Click for full-size image (j2.jpg)
5.3 KB27 views
Click for full-size image (l1.jpg)
5.4 KB36 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2006, 04:49 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
hmm... a bit heavy heanded with the first one
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2006, 04:52 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Glad to see you're getting out there and making the most of a rapidly disappearing Jupiter ving.

Details man, details. Settings, scope, mount, time, place, were you allowed back in the house after spending all night outside? Details.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2006, 04:53 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
No, I like the first one best, it shows more details!

Great job Mista!

Permission to have a go at reprocessing it for ya!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2006, 04:57 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
8" newt f6
lpi plus 2 2x barlows.

pretty standard k3 settings. I noticed that when the pros here take pics the have the exposure set to 1/25th or something... i do that and it disapears of the screen!!! i had to have 1/6" exposure!!! seem awfully long! whats with that?

standard processing as per mikes tute except the first one which i went heavy on teh wavelettes...
thats about it.
oh and fiddled in psp8 with unsharp and other stuff
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2006, 04:58 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
re process away asi
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2006, 04:59 PM
joe_smith's Avatar
joe_smith
Registered User

joe_smith is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ingleburn
Posts: 481
Good ones Ving They look pretty cool.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2006, 05:01 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Quote:
I noticed that when the pros here take pics the have the exposure set to 1/25th or something... i do that and it disapears of the screen!!! i had to have 1/6" exposure!!! seem awfully long! whats with that?
something strange there. What are your gain and fps settings? I might get a chance tomorrow night to get the LPI out and check it out. Those onion rings you are getting are normally a sign of the gain not being set high enough.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2006, 05:43 PM
Hitchhiker's Avatar
Hitchhiker
knows where his towel is

Hitchhiker is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 371
Well done, ving.

Quote:
i had to have 1/6" exposure
For my Jupiter images with my LPI (10" SCT & 2.5x Powermate) I use 1/4 to 1/5 of a sec exposure.

I remember Paul posted an article on K3CCDTools not reporting exposure times correctly for the ToUCam (the exposure time reported varied with the fps). I use Envisage for my captures and about 1/4 sec fills the histogram nicely.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-08-2006, 05:50 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Yeah, the good ol' onions come into the picture if you try to reprocess

Oh well.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-08-2006, 06:28 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,639
Goodonya David.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-08-2006, 06:32 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitchhiker
Well done, ving.



For my Jupiter images with my LPI (10" SCT & 2.5x Powermate) I use 1/4 to 1/5 of a sec exposure.

I remember Paul posted an article on K3CCDTools not reporting exposure times correctly for the ToUCam (the exposure time reported varied with the fps). I use Envisage for my captures and about 1/4 sec fills the histogram nicely.
good to hear. i thought i was going crazy!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-08-2006, 07:06 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
You're getting there Ving, the colours look very natural.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-08-2006, 07:07 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
I've just run a session throough the LPI and there were no Onion Rings but boy the colour sucks. I'll finish processing it and post it later.

Edit:

Here's the image. There are no/very little onion but the colour is woeful. I wasn't able to do anything with the exposure so I just used the default exposure of 50ms and adjusted the ones I could. I will admits that I found it very frustrating trying to get the settings right.

I also did a run using Virtual Dub capture, but I can't find where VD saved it to . I'll track it down and post it later
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jupiter_2006-08-11_17-41_0001.jpg)
3.9 KB18 views

Last edited by [1ponders]; 11-08-2006 at 07:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-08-2006, 08:10 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Hi Mr. Ving-a-ling,

Nice to see some of your stuff, and I would say that is quite a reasonable result with the conditions you had. Yep I also like to see the most detail= the first one, colour is good. Can you increase your gain and either decrease brightness or shorten your exposure, to keep the image at the same brightness. Looks like you had the exposure just right in the first one, just gotta kill the onions.

Like I said nice to see your stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-08-2006, 09:01 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
I like the first one best, great colour.
Keep em coming.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:12 PM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Good on yer ving
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-08-2006, 10:53 AM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
yes i think you did well as conditions here-visually were shocking. the image in the eyepiece was bubbling all over the place
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-08-2006, 11:30 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lester
Hi Mr. Ving-a-ling,

Nice to see some of your stuff, and I would say that is quite a reasonable result with the conditions you had. Yep I also like to see the most detail= the first one, colour is good. Can you increase your gain and either decrease brightness or shorten your exposure, to keep the image at the same brightness. Looks like you had the exposure just right in the first one, just gotta kill the onions.

Like I said nice to see your stuff.
they all had the same exposure seting. Gain isnt where it should be in k3ccd (ie with the rest of the cammera settings), infact i couldnt find gain at all! I just work on getting a certain image brightness on the screen.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-08-2006, 11:42 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Hi Ving,

I don't use that program, perhaps someone that does can inform you on where the gain control is. That will help minimise the onion rings.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement