Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-08-2006, 12:14 AM
Zac Pujic
Registered User

Zac Pujic is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 112
Aristarchus: ToUcam vs SkyNyx 2.1M

I imaged the Aristarchus Plateau again, this time with my SkyNyx 2.1M under poor seeing. It produced a better image than my ToUcam did under good conditions.

SkyNyx 2.1M image is here

http://astroimg.org/latestlunar.html

The ToUcam version is here

http://astroimg.org/LunarPics/Aristarchus.jpg

31 cm Newtonian at f/28 for the ToUcam image (haven't calculated the f/ratio for the SkyNyx version yet). Wratten 25A filter. Frames stacked using MAP function in Registax 4beta.

Zac Pujic
Brisbane, Australia
http://astroimg.org
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2006, 12:57 AM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
Wow, thats a big diffrence in image sharpness/detail. How was the seeing out of 10 on the two nights?
Have not heard of the skynyx who makes these cameras?

Great work.

Regards
Netwolf
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2006, 01:12 AM
Zac Pujic
Registered User

Zac Pujic is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 112
SkyNyx cameras

Lumenera make SkyNyx cameras. The SkyNyx line of cameras have only recently been released, although Lumenera make others including the LUO75 which has been used in the last couple of years by prominent planetary imagers. They're available through Adirondack Video in the US (astrovid.com). They're a bit pricey but worth the money. Unfortunately you have to get a fast computer too.

Seeing on the ToUcam night was good-very good (but not fantastic). Maybe 8/10.

Seeing on the SkyNyx night was poor. Around 4/10.

I'm amazed at how much detail the SkyNyx shows despite the seeing being poor. I'm glad I didn't give up. Also, the SkyNyx can record 12-bit data while the ToUcam is only 8-bit. It means image processing is less likely to produce artefacts.

Zac
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:49 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,828
Hello, Zac

Those are very nice images - both. The detail in each is mouth watering. Thanks for posting the comparison between the two cameras; it was very interesting to see the difference.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-08-2006, 06:49 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Nice work Zac, look forward to more comparisons. The resolution on the skynyx seems to be a long way ahead of the ToUcam.

How much were these resampled?

I'd like to see one at original scale if you can post it?

How many FPS were you capturing at?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-08-2006, 08:12 AM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
Hi Zac, both are pretty special images, though the Skynx seems to have brought out more detail, but it does look a little more pushed than the Toucam one as well?

I was "this" close to getting the SKynx. By the way Telescopes and Astronomy in SA will also get these in for you and the price I was quoted was comparable (perhaps even cheaper if you get stung by customs duty) than getting them in from the states. Ah well, it's the DMK for me for now

cheers,
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement