Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-03-2014, 09:09 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
NGC 2997 8 hours with Star Tools Help!

Hey all, I recently added more data to my NGC 2997. It is now 8 hours and ten minutes with a 110mm f6 refractor, five min subs calibrated.
I initially got some help with Star Tools from Ivo, the source himself!, and he was kind enough to write down a menu to help in processing, which I followed on this reprocessed with added data...
I also tried to eliminate the dead pixel columns with mixed success (I tried on the right only). First one is a crop to avoid these..
I wondered why they sprang up as I as dithering in nebulosity (small or medium dither/0.2 sec)
I never noticed them on the original set of subs (these were taken on four different nights) but they might have been there all along.
Anyway
8 hrs 10 x 300sec with QHY 8 OSC f6 110mm
Processed (thanks again Ivo!) StarTools after stacking and calibration in DSS.
I think this is my best effort yet (my efforts so far have been climbing up Mount Modest at the best of times!).
Cheers for looking
Graham
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2997finalstack810st2 - Version 2.jpg)
178.4 KB63 views
Click for full-size image (2997finalstack810st2.jpg)
189.0 KB45 views

Last edited by graham.hobart; 11-03-2014 at 10:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2014, 09:12 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Well, a good improvement Graham, some nice rich colours coming through

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2014, 10:26 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
crikey what a difference! looking good.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-2014, 10:33 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
Talking Ngc 2997

I know -I can't believe I was sitting on this data all along!
I now have to go back and reprocess lots of old stuff!
Curses!

A very pleased Graz!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-03-2014, 10:46 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
occasional columns with reduced sensitivity seem to be an issue with QHY8. Sander supplied a bit of code that apparently can repair this problem when darks/flats will not. http://qhyccd.com/ccdbbs/index.php?topic=2665.0

Last edited by Shiraz; 12-03-2014 at 09:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-2014, 11:30 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
Ngc 2997

Much appreciated Ray. Will have to digest that code when not so late at night!
One question, why does the last poster say darks are a NO No for the QHY 8?
Mine is the old style square one with an updated TEC 2 cooler but still I would have thought that everyone except StrongManMike uses darks?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-2014, 12:29 AM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham.hobart View Post
Much appreciated Ray. Will have to digest that code when not so late at night!
One question, why does the last poster say darks are a NO No for the QHY 8?
Mine is the old style square one with an updated TEC 2 cooler but still I would have thought that everyone except StrongManMike uses darks?
The QHY8 does not have a regulated temperature, so dark calibration is less reliable than on set point cameras (unless yours has a set point capability). However, the thermal noise is so low anyway that there is no real need for darks - just do a bad pixel mapping and replacement to get rid of hot pixels and the residual thermal noise will be well below the shot noise in the sky signal. Dither will remove any fixed pattern in the residual dark current if needed, but I never found it to be a problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement