Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross G
Beautiful galaxy photo Greg.
I really like the widefield.
Ross.
|
Thanks Ross. It is a beautiful galaxy. One of the prettiest I have seen s far in the Southern Hemipshere - up with NGC6744.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alistairsam
That's a beautiful looking Galaxy Greg, the widefield looks superb.
What is its magnitude and what was your image scale?
Edit: not sure if its a galaxy on the top left, 11 O'clock, but that looks a bit like the LMC
Cheers
Alistair
|
Thanks Alistair.
Its magnitude 9.8.
Image scale is .66 arc secs/pixel which should be around perfect. It seems to work well. An AO would help with the seeing at times.
The small companion galaxy is PGC11834.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
It is a real beauty, Greg, and that's a lovely rendition.
How long were your subs (10 minutes?) and what was your image scale? The brightest jet in NGC1097 was only delivering a few photons per pixel in 10 minute luminance subs with the 12" Ceravolo and 0.67 arcsec/pixel image scale.
Cheers,
Rick.
|
Thanks Rick.
Same image scale .66 arc sec and 10 minute subs 1x1 binned.
Jets are really faint.
I caught 2 of the 3 jets of NGC1097 and it won an honourable mention at the Malins. From my dark site observatory a few years ago with a Tak BRC250 F5 and a FLI Microline 8300 here ( I was running the camera at either -40C or -45, probably -40C as it was summer):
http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/108628609
As I recall I was using a clear filter rather than a luminance filter (no UV/IR coating but keeps the same focus).
You can also image the luminance with no filter if it picks up a bit more. The cost will be bright stars will be more bloated. I did a series of galaxy images using the clear filter in the summer of 2009 I think. I got a run of 11 clear nights in a row at my dark site over the New Year period!
Greg.