Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-08-2013, 07:09 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,900
Best crossover telescope/spotter?

I've always liked small refractors, and have always been on the lookout for the perfect small scope that would do double duty as a spotter and an astronomical scope, within the obvious limitations of small aperture. I've tried a 70ED scope and more recently a Megrez 72 but felt they were a bit heavier than I'd like.

The old William Optics ZS66 is lighter but is essentially restricted to 1.25" eyepieces due to focus issues with larger ones, so that limits the field of view to around 4 degrees, which is a bit restrictive for terrestrial since the Megrez 72 with its 2" focuser can achieve 7 degrees, similar to binoculars.

Have thought about a dedicated spotter but their prisms are either fixed straight through or 45-degree, neither ideal for astro.

Anyone else using a small scope for both purposes? What are you using?

Cheers

Morton
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-08-2013, 08:16 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
canon 15x50IS -i much prefer binos for spotting
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-08-2013, 08:43 PM
Profiler (Profiler)
Registered User

Profiler is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,217
Hi Morton

Probably the best small scope with portability being the key criteria would be the TV-60 - it has to be seen to be believed in terms of its small size and clever design with a helical focuser etc - however - the big downside - it's design only allows use of a 1.25 diagonal/Eps. Naturally, it also works as a delux finder.

If you eleminate the TV-60 on the basis of needing something that will take 2' EPs/diagonals etc then the Tak 60 is slightly better on every other attribute but loses to the TV-60 in terms of sacrificing portability

Last edited by Profiler; 24-08-2013 at 09:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-08-2013, 09:20 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profiler View Post
Hi Morton

Probably the best small scope with portability being the key criteria would be the TV-60 - it has to be seen to be believed in terms of its small size and clever design with a helical focuser etc - however - the big downside - it's design only allows use of a 1.25 diagonal/Eps. Naturally, it also works as a delux finder.

If you eleminate the TV-60 on the basis of needing something that will take 2' EPs/diagonals etc then the Tak 60 is slightly better on every other attribute but loses to the TV-60 in terms of sacrificing portability
Yeah, and I wouldn't be spending close to a grand on a casual spotter!

Astro Tech had a short-lived 60ED but it was a triplet, as heavy as a 72mm scope and the optics weren't great. Otherwise it was exactly what I wanted!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-08-2013, 09:54 PM
anj026's Avatar
anj026
Plyscope

anj026 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 530
The TV 60 has been my little travel scope/daytime scope for a while now. I use the Panoptic 24mm, Nagler 9mm and 3-6mm zoom and that covers most uses from 15x terrestial to 40x close-ups to lunar and planets up to 120x. I had a William Optics 66SD previously.

When I want a wider field of view than the TV 60/Pan 24 then I use binoculars such as a wide angle 10x50 or 8x30.

If you want light weight/less expensive then you may want to look for a second hand Borg 60 or 70mm.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-08-2013, 10:31 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by anj026 View Post
The TV 60 has been my little travel scope/daytime scope for a while now. I use the Panoptic 24mm, Nagler 9mm and 3-6mm zoom and that covers most uses from 15x terrestial to 40x close-ups to lunar and planets up to 120x. I had a William Optics 66SD previously.

When I want a wider field of view than the TV 60/Pan 24 then I use binoculars such as a wide angle 10x50 or 8x30.

If you want light weight/less expensive then you may want to look for a second hand Borg 60 or 70mm.
Good points. Since I already have binos maybe I don't need the 2" capability in the scope.

Thanks, Andy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement