Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-04-2013, 08:08 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Photoshop and RAM not playing nice again.

I've been seeing this happen more often lately.

(Picture 1)
Not enough RAM.

Why? It's only one picture!?

(Picture 2)
When saving, what do these three choices mean when you are saving an image for print?

*Baseline ("Standard")
*Baseline Optimized
*Progressive

What does that bit down the bottom mean? "Scans) (3)

(I am saving them as 72DPI and 800x600 pixels for the net, then it's 240DPI at 8x12 inches, 20x30 inches and this one was 42 inches on the long side.)
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (errorscrnsht.JPG)
153.0 KB42 views
Click for full-size image (baselinescrnsht.JPG)
141.6 KB36 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-04-2013, 11:12 PM
Joshua Bunn's Avatar
Joshua Bunn (Joshua)
Registered User

Joshua Bunn is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albany, Western Australia
Posts: 1,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodhound31 View Post
Not enough RAM.

Why? It's only one picture!?
maybe you need to assign more RAM to photoshop. go to Edit > preferences >performance and change the memory usage at top left. Then again you may need a machine with more RAM.

Josh
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-04-2013, 12:01 AM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Baz, is this a 32 bit or 64 bit system? Your image has 206Mpx, and that's probably pushing the bounds for a 32 bit version of Photoshop by the time you've done some processing like layers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-04-2013, 12:31 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Thanks guys. It's a 32 bit XP PC with 2Gb of RAM.

The new machine in the observatory is slowly taking over the tasks I've customarily been doing on this little laptop, so it's not a biggie. This one will go out on the front lawn soon and suffer the wrath of my mattock, just like my Ryobi arc-welder did......
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-04-2013, 01:38 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Allow more swap space on your hard drive and you'll be right. It's under preferences/scratch disk or performance.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-04-2013, 02:05 PM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodhound31 View Post
Thanks guys. It's a 32 bit XP PC with 2Gb of RAM.

The new machine in the observatory is slowly taking over the tasks I've customarily been doing on this little laptop, so it's not a biggie. This one will go out on the front lawn soon and suffer the wrath of my mattock, just like my Ryobi arc-welder did......
2 gig of ram is useless, you need to double it to 4 to get photoshop to work half decently
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-04-2013, 02:20 PM
pluto's Avatar
pluto (Hugh)
Astro Noob

pluto is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
2 gig of ram is useless, you need to double it to 4 to get photoshop to work half decently
Remember though that a 32bit OS is only going to be able to use 3gb. I agree you should get more RAM but not much point if you don't upgrade to a 64bit OS.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22-04-2013, 04:23 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
2 gig of ram is useless, you need to double it to 4 to get photoshop to work half decently
Well, I have been using 2gb of RAM for nearly 6 years, performing photoshop (elements 6) editing tasks for professional photography of weddings, real-estate, portrait shoots, conferences, landscape, macro, product, wildlife and astro. It's seemed to be good enough until recently.

Just goes to show what you can squeeze out of cheap programs and underpowered computers hey?

Still, the 64bit-8GB-windows 7 machine I have now in the observatory is super-fast by comparison. I wonder how long it will be before that's not enough?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-04-2013, 07:56 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodhound31 View Post
Still, the 64bit-8GB-windows 7 machine I have now in the observatory is super-fast by comparison. I wonder how long it will be before that's not enough?
Perhaps swap'em around Baz. My observatory system was a 2GB intel Atom set up which was hardly a power house. It didn't need to do much other than run the hardware (mount, camera, focusing etc) and acquire images.

The processing system needs the grunt and memory. Recently, I bought a dedicated solid state drive and set it up as a scratch disk in photoshop. Wow, major performance improvement. I think the next system I build for processing will be all solid state with exception to a large disk for archiving/storage as opposed running apps from.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement