#1  
Old 01-07-2012, 01:39 PM
Honest_Gaza (Garry)
Registered User

Honest_Gaza is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Dobsonian + DSLR + TC ?

Reading various threads on the limitations of using a DSLR on a Dobsonian, it seems that general consensus is that the camera sensor needs to get closer to the Scopes Mirror.

There seems to be 3 main ways of achieving this :

  • Moving the Primary Mirror (seems a bit drastic)
  • Low profile Eyepiece mount (requires some mods / hole drilling......hopefully I'm correct with this one)
  • Add a Barlow lens to magnify the image (simple but not always enough magnification)


It is the last one that has me thinking about a possible solution and not sure if anyone has tried it.


Does the addition of a Tele-Converter on the DSLR get you the "perceived" extra distance that you need for the Camera sensor to focus ?


Therefore...Camera + TC + Adapter + T-Ring + Barlow
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2012, 01:47 PM
naskies's Avatar
naskies (Dave)
Registered User

naskies is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honest_Gaza View Post
[*]Moving the Primary Mirror (seems a bit drastic)
I can get my Skywatcher flex tube Dob to focus simply by not extending the secondary mirror all the way, i.e. about an inch short of the normal visual position.

It's one (of several) reason why I went with a truss instead of solid tube version.

The downside of using a barlow/teleconverter is that the focal length may become too long for convenience. An APS-C (crop) sensor will just fit in the sun/moon at a focal length of ~ 1600 mm... so even with just a 2x extender you probably wouldn't be able to fit them in with a single shot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2012, 02:12 PM
Honest_Gaza (Garry)
Registered User

Honest_Gaza is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Yes but I think the issue at this stage is one of "focus" not "field of view".
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2012, 06:46 PM
trek1701's Avatar
trek1701 (Mark)
Registered User

trek1701 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 203
Check Chris’s helpful comment on this post back in May


http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=91048


Cheers Mark
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2012, 08:48 PM
stephenb's Avatar
stephenb (Stephen)
Registered User

stephenb is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: all over the shop...
Posts: 2,098
A forth way

Garry,

As you've discovered there are three methods of observing which I use on my 10" Dob are visual (i.e. an eyepiece), a DSLR and a CCD camera. Unfortunately each one focuses at a different point on the focuser. Most off-the-shelf newtonians are setup for the eyepieces and, as you're aware, they don't allow enough focus travel to accommodate all three.

However I achieved all three by simply replacing the collimation screws on the primary mirror and inserting some longer springs.

Now my ccd camera (DBK41) focuses about 5mm from the bottom of the focuser travel, the DSLR is around the middle of the focuser travel, and the eyepiece focuses at the extreme top of the focuser travel. Admittedly I need to slide the eyepiece out about 7mm but it works fine.

I never entertained the idea of cutting the tube shorter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2012, 09:47 PM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 979
i'll second stephenb's suggestion. I modded my 8" dob recently to allow prime focus DSLR imaging simply by replacing the collimation/locking screws and using longer (and stiffer) springs.

For my GSO/Bintel dob the collimation screws use a 6mm thread, so I purchased six 50mm long 6mm screws, and three new compression springs from my local Bunnings. 10 minutes to fit, less than $20 spent, couldn't be easier

DSLR now comes to focus with about 10mm of focus travel. For visual use I now simply use a 35mm extension tube with my eyepieces.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2012, 09:59 PM
stephenb's Avatar
stephenb (Stephen)
Registered User

stephenb is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: all over the shop...
Posts: 2,098
Richard, I used the exact items from my local Bunnings

Once I removed the 'black knob' collimation screws and replaced them with the 6mm x 50mm long screws, I then used the 'black knob' screws in place of the 'white knob' locking screws.

I should use a 35mm extension but I haven't had the chance to get to BinTel at this stage.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2012, 11:40 PM
Honest_Gaza (Garry)
Registered User

Honest_Gaza is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by trek1701 View Post
Check Chris’s helpful comment on this post back in May


http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=91048


Cheers Mark
Thanks Mark....will look at this as an option.

Stephen and Richard....at this stage I'll leave the collimations screws "as is"...would hate to bugger it up this early on in the piece....but thanks for the suggestions.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-07-2012, 03:38 AM
swannies1983 (Dan)
Registered User

swannies1983 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 781
Quote:
Originally Posted by trek1701 View Post
Check Chris’s helpful comment on this post back in May


http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=91048


Cheers Mark
+1. I replied in that thread stating how I didn't need to make any modification with my Skywatcher Newt. With the dslr attached, I have about 5mm inwards travel of the focuser. Not sure if this means I would or wouldn't be able to use a coma corrector.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-07-2012, 02:31 PM
Wookie's Avatar
Wookie (Ryan)
Registered User

Wookie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 119
Hey Garry,

I'm in the same boat.
I have a bintel (Gso) 10" and I can not get close to focus with my dslr.
I can achieve focus with a 2x Barlow with about 10mm of inward travel to spare.
I assume its worse for mine since it has a1250mm focal length.
I was considering a low profile focuser but the 50mm x 6mm bolts look like an attractive first path.
I'll keep you posted.

Ryan.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-07-2012, 02:35 PM
swannies1983 (Dan)
Registered User

swannies1983 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 781
Bummer that you couldn't get focus Ryan.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-07-2012, 01:52 PM
Honest_Gaza (Garry)
Registered User

Honest_Gaza is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
I'll put this on hold for now....don't want to spend too much money on further accessories until I'm convinced they are going to work.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-02-2013, 10:39 PM
Honest_Gaza (Garry)
Registered User

Honest_Gaza is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
OK...taken off hold again.

Purchased the T-Ring and EOS Adapter....DSLR couldn't focus, but no surprises there.

Followed the earlier instructions of 6mm x 50mm screws....re-collimated...but can't focus with the DSLR. Found Jupiter up in the sky but when trying to use the DSLR to focus, all I get is what I believe is one of the mirrors. A ball and a telescopic sight.

When I swing the telescope away from Jupiter, the "telescopic sight" disappears....so it does seem to be light related.

Suggestions ? Have I extended the mirror too far up the 50mm screws....or not enough ?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-02-2013, 04:55 AM
stephenb's Avatar
stephenb (Stephen)
Registered User

stephenb is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: all over the shop...
Posts: 2,098
By "telescope sight" I assume you mean something that looks like crosshairs with a round obstruction in the centre? That is your secondary mirror the four spider vanes simply way out of focus. Your DSLR is not in focus then. You need to wind the focuser from one end of travel to the other and see if there is a difference.

Think of it this way.... The distance from the surface of the primary mirror, up the tube, bouncing off the secondary diagonal mirror, up the focuser and onto the surface of the CCD camera chip - that distance is what needs to be correct for the image in the camera to be "in focus" Or what we call the Focal Length. This distance will be different for an eyepiece.

So when you wind the focuser all the way out, you are lengthening this distance. Winding it in, you are shortening the distance. It would appear you do not have enough travel in the focuser to find the correct distance for the camera.

If you wind the focuser one way or the other does the "telescope sight" vary in size? Does it get better in one direction? If you wind it out and it gets better ( better means the telescope sight gets smaller and the big blurry light behind it (which is Jupiter out way out of focus) gets smaller, then you need to push the primary mirror back down the tube.

Last edited by stephenb; 10-02-2013 at 09:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-02-2013, 08:31 AM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 979
I second stephen's assessment - sounds like you were just out of focus

With the 6 x 50mm screws I found that I achieved focus with the DSLR + MPCC when the focuser was (from memory) at about the ~15mm position ie about the middle of the focuser's travel. However I agree with the previous suggestion - rack the focusser all the way from one end of its travel to the other
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-02-2013, 10:45 AM
Honest_Gaza (Garry)
Registered User

Honest_Gaza is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Thanks Guys....did further adjustments of the 50mm screws yesterday in anticipation of fine tuning in the evening....and wouldn't you know it, cloudy skies in Sydney for the whole evening.

Maybe tonight, although storms are forecast.

I'm comfortable with the theory of the focuser replacing the normal function of a zoom lens...just not sure what movement is required in the primary mirror in terms of distance. With the mirror sitting at the end of the 50mm screws, this positions it approx 20mm further up the tube (and therefore closer to my camera sensor) than would have been possible with the original collimation screws.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15-02-2013, 07:17 PM
Honest_Gaza (Garry)
Registered User

Honest_Gaza is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
< mental note to oneself >
When moving the Primary Mirror, and deciding you need to recollimate....make sure the Barlow is removed first.

Otherwise, no amount of adjustments will get the laser to provide a pin-sharp dot
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement