Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-11-2012, 09:29 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
BabyQ vs FLT110

Weather was closing in and I had time for 90 minutes - so I ran luminance only on these 2 scopes - A BabyQ FSQ85EDX at f5.3 with an SXVR_H16 Astrodon filter on a Titan vs WO FLT110 at f7 with ATIK LE4000 (same sensor as the SX) with Astronomic filter on a G11. Both used OAG with Lodestar or equivalent.
The WO did the Witches Head with 10 min subs and the BabyQ did the Pleides in 5 min subs.
CCD Inspector says the Baby Q is as flat as a tack but the WO has a little tilt but both are well collimated.
The night before I had done some runs on M33 with the same setup but doing full LRGB. The results are iteresting.
I love the BabyQ but am pretty darned happy with the WO as well.
Peter
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M33BQSXLRGB60x3x30Sml.jpg)
166.3 KB69 views
Click for full-size image (M33WOATLRGB30x4Sml.jpg)
170.7 KB75 views
Click for full-size image (IC2118WOATLum90Sml.jpg)
143.5 KB58 views
Click for full-size image (M45LumBQSX18x5Sml.jpg)
147.1 KB66 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2012, 09:55 AM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
All the images look excellent, Peter. Both are good scopes, aren't they?
I think I prefer the larger image of M33-there is more detail in the core.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2012, 05:45 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Good work, Peter! I expect you'd see a significant difference between the scopes with a larger sensor.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2012, 12:39 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
Thanks Laurie, Rick.
You're right about the larger sensor Rick, but the balancing factor, for me,has been that I can use a 7-slot FW with this sensor and 1 1/4 inch filters - keeping the weight and cost way down. I am going to press on for a year or so with this image scale and do the best I can with it. Perhaps I will switch up again in time but for now I'm at a sweet spot.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:48 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
All good looking photos Peter.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement