NGC7635 and M52 - slight reprocess

[Stevec35 (Steve)]

Hi

Don't know if anyone is interested but I did this one again as a HaRGB rather than a HaLRGB as I decided my luminance data was rubbish. I now think it looks better.

Cheers

Steve

http://members.pcug.org.au/~stevec/n...aknewt_QSI.htm

[tilbrook@rbe.ne (Justin Tilbrook)]

Hi Steve,

Love the colours, processing looks good.

Hard to tell them apart, the second looks slightly more vibrant.

Cheers,

Justin.

[Stevec35 (Steve)]

Originally Posted by tilbrook@rbe.ne

Hi Steve,

Love the colours, processing looks good.

Hard to tell them apart, the second looks slightly more vibrant.

Cheers,

Justin.

Thanks Justin. There isn't a lot of difference. I thought the stars looked a bit more natural in this case.

[Larryp (Laurie)]

Really nice image!

[Stevec35 (Steve)]

Originally Posted by Larryp

Really nice image!

Thanks Laurie

[pvelez (Pete)]

That's a great image - I need to go hunting for it.

Can you share the scope, exposure time details?

Pete

[Stevec35 (Steve)]

Originally Posted by pvelez

That's a great image - I need to go hunting for it.

Can you share the scope, exposure time details?

Pete

Thanks Pete. At declination +61 you won't see it from Sydney. This image was taken remotely using a scope near Benson Arizona. All the details are in the image caption but the exposure was a HaRGB 240:90:130:100. The scope is a 20cm F4 Maksutov Newtonian and the CCD camera a QSI 583 WSG.

[atalas]

Very nice Steve.

[Stevec35 (Steve)]

Originally Posted by atalas

Very nice Steve.

Thanks Louie

[Ross G]

Still a great looking photo Steve.

Ross.

[Stevec35 (Steve)]

Originally Posted by Ross G

Still a great looking photo Steve.

Ross.

Thanks Ross. Yes I think it turned out okay.