Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-10-2012, 06:13 PM
Davros's Avatar
Davros (Lauren)
stumblebum

Davros is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maroochydore
Posts: 765
monopod vs. tripod

So i am going to Singapore at the end of the month and i have a query. I have a decent tripod which i was planning on taking to assist with photography (Canon 30D with 28-70L) targeting wildlife and landscape images. Would i be able to get away with a monopod? Are monopods even worth contemplating? Or should i just stick with what i've got.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2012, 06:25 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,437
G'Day Mick,

I have a pretty limited experience with monopods, so don't take what I say as gospel. I have a trekking pole with a 4/20 thread in the top under the knob so it doubles as a monopod when bushwalking.

For long exposures, existing light and shady scenes, the tripod will definitely be better. If your lens is IS you might get away with a bit more on the monopod. Both will take the weight off holding the camera in long sessions, but the monopod is quicker and easier to move about. Both should work OK for panoramas with todays software.

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2012, 06:35 PM
gb_astro
Registered User

gb_astro is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davros View Post
So i am going to Singapore at the end of the month and i have a query. I have a decent tripod which i was planning on taking to assist with photography (Canon 30D with 28-70L) targeting wildlife and landscape images. Would i be able to get away with a monopod? Are monopods even worth contemplating? Or should i just stick with what i've got.
There are some pretty light and compact tripods around these days.

gb.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2012, 06:46 PM
Davros's Avatar
Davros (Lauren)
stumblebum

Davros is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maroochydore
Posts: 765
Thanks guys, my tripod is fairly lightweight, its a generic ball head. I will be on my feet all day everyday in that lovely humidity and was thinking about keeping everything as lightweight as possible. I might just go with the tripod and see how it goes. I would hate to be caught out by not having the option.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2012, 06:55 PM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
I sed a monopod for quite a while.
It was a love/hate thing.
In good light and for non-crucial shots (happy snaps) it was worth a stop or two.
But for any shot below about 1/100, an IS lens would be a better bet with your Canon as you not only have to hold the camera still, but the monopod as well.
Just my experience, but I would avoid a very light CF tripod as I've found them prone to vibration.
I'm currently using a Velbon Sherpa R with my 40D and 70-200 2.8 with great results.
The tripod is compact, easy to set and the head is very sturdy. It's not CF but very lightweight Al. Best of all it's only about $130 (shop around).

Hope that's useful.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-10-2012, 07:44 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
I would go the monopod for travel in heat and humidity. If you find that you need to steady it more just grab a stick or two, spread the bottom ends away from the monopod and hold the top of the stick or sticks firmly against the mono and hey presto! you have a tripod.

Used this trick successfully many times.

I even managed to use a monopod at St Peter's Basilica, the Louvre and a few other places where tripods are banned. Rest the monopod on the ground near a wall of something sturdy grab the camera in such a manner that your outstretched elbow can rest on a wall etc.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-10-2012, 09:36 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,437
Just a thought, prompted by Matt's improvised tripod...

I used to carry a washer (or key) with a length of string and a 4/20 eye bolt on the other end. Drop the washer on the ground and put your foot on it, screw the eye bolt into the camera and pull the string taut... not as good as a tripod, but with practice it should allow you take shots you couldn't simply hand-hold. Its very lightweight (i.e. great for bushwalking).

I haven't done it since I've had an IS camera...

It might complement the tripod, but I suggest you have a play and a practice with it.

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-10-2012, 09:36 PM
Nico13's Avatar
Nico13 (Ken)
Galaxy Hunting

Nico13 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Geelong region.
Posts: 947
Hi Mick,
I have used both for a number of years now but normally I wouldn't bother with the Mono Pod unless I was using over 200mm fl and looking at almost a snap shooting scenario for wild life or sports event.
You mentioned 28-70mm was your maximum and landscapes as desirable, my personal choice would be the tripod if you were expecting a lot of low light situations like sunrises and sets etc, but if you anticipate reasonable lighting conditions then the mono would achieve both outcomes quite well and be a lot less bulk and weight to carry. hope this helps.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-10-2012, 10:41 PM
Davros's Avatar
Davros (Lauren)
stumblebum

Davros is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maroochydore
Posts: 765
Thanks guys, this has given me a lot to think about.
cheers
Mick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement