Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-09-2012, 05:59 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Jupiter 19th Sept. 2012

Thought the seeing looked passable naked eye but nope, good old seeing gods had invoked that fast jetstream that can't be picked with your eye - The camera tells all though Had some tube currents as well. Note to self: set the scope up at least 3 hrs before bothering to shoot, not 1.5 hrs..

Ah well.

C11/DBK618 @ 30FPS F22 2800 from 6000 stacked.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2800 at 30 fps_jupe 19th sept0012_g4_b3_ap36.png)
179.0 KB149 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-09-2012, 08:37 AM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
John, still a good result given the conditions. A bit cruel when the high magnification seeing doesn't live up to the naked eye appearance!

-Ivan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-09-2012, 09:22 AM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,110
Creditable result for the conditions Asi, it seems the passage of Oval BA past the GRS has had very little effect on either, as expected.

Regards
Trevor
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-09-2012, 10:17 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Thanks Ivan. It's a cruel hobby this one but I'm used to being treated this way, lol.

Thanks Trevor. Yes indeed, the 2 spots can pass each other at their seemingly (to us) small distance to each other & go unnoticed to each other as usual.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-09-2012, 07:03 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
still a good image Asi - plenty to see. regards Ray
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-09-2012, 07:23 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Ray & thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-09-2012, 11:15 PM
Troy's Avatar
Troy
Registered User

Troy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 946
Good image John, certainly better than my jup's at the moment.
My C9.25 needs 1 hr cool down, so 3hrs for a C11 WOW

8-)

Troy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-09-2012, 08:57 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Troy & thanks. I have the CF model C11 so yes, at least 3 hrs is best. Depends completely on the circumstances of course. Right now it's housed in a room that gets rather warm during the day & the nights are still chilly so it has to drop at least 12-15 degrees. When summer finally gets here there is very little difference between day & night time temps. so less time is required for cooldown.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-09-2012, 04:26 PM
Troy's Avatar
Troy
Registered User

Troy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 946
That's why I have put off buying/building an observatory. 8-)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement