Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-05-2006, 10:41 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
K3CCDtools display rate

Hi guys.

Been experimenting with K3CCDTools as my capture software.

Noticed the image on the laptop screen appears to show the image refreshing a little too slowly. It looks staggerd and jerky, making focusing difficult.

It doesn't look to be displaying the image as smoothly as AmCap.

Is there a setting or adjustment you can tell me to tick/make to solve this?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-05-2006, 01:56 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,826
Hi Matt

Check the fps setting, (frames per second). In K3CCDTools on my notebook, 5fps gives a slow refresh rate which makes focusing a bit tricky, whereas 10fps is about right for focusing.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-05-2006, 02:06 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Thanks Dennis

Think we had it on 10fps.

It just looked sort of staggered on the screen. Like using a strobe light on a slow moving object
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-05-2006, 02:50 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
It does that for me as well matt. During capture np, but when adjusting the settings and focusing it is a very slow refresh rate.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-05-2006, 02:55 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Found it matt. Go into the setting dialogue box (where you specify what folder to save captures to) and you will see down the bottom 200 ms in the preview rate. Change it to 25 or 50 and see how you go. 25 made a considerable difference
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-05-2006, 03:01 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Thanks Paul

Yeah. Was looking at the ms rate and even had it set to 1, but the refresh rate is still fairly obvious to the eye.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-05-2006, 03:08 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
I couldn't tell much of a difference in the rate until I put the original lens back in and pointed it to my ugly mug. I then set it to 1000 and checked and then to 25. Definate difference. See how it goes tonight on Jupiter, if you're clear that is.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-05-2006, 03:10 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Looks OK at the moment Paul.

Don't wanna say much more than that. Weather Gods are listening
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-05-2006, 04:23 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I have that setting to 1.

But like Dennis says, it doesn't appear to refresh any faster than the FPS rate.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement