What a beautiful blast off that was And such a great looking rocket with those 4 boosters at the back
The video showed the rocket zooming skywards, but NOT A BIT OF SMOKE What fuel was it burning??? Looks like a natural gas flame ..... Not like those dreadfully smokey shuttle take offs . Any ideas?? HEY, it has docked now..
JIMMY
I have to say that the Long March rockets look like tin cans to me. LOL... The tapered boosters of the Russian's decades-old R7 looks like poetry in motion in comparison.
Now that they have the prototype build and bugs ironed out, I hear they are building 16 factories to mass produce them and drive the costs down so everyone can afford to have one. They want to get the cost per launch vehicle down to $100,000.
Now that they have the prototype build and bugs ironed out, I hear they are building 16 factories to mass produce them and drive the costs down so everyone can afford to have one. They want to get the cost per launch vehicle down to $100,000.
"Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness"
Who knows whats possible I bet you they'd like to get all their ore etc for free and where else but in space
Here are some common liquid fuel combinations in use today:
LOX and kerosene (RP-1). Used for the lower stages of the Soyuz boosters, and the first stage of the U.S. Saturn V, Atlas, and Falcon 9 boosters. Very similar to Robert Goddard's first rocket.
Nitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) and UDMH or MMH. Used in three first stages of the Russian Proton booster, most Chinese boosters, a number of military, orbital and deep space rockets, as this fuel combination is hypergolic and storable for long periods at reasonable temperatures and pressures.
hydrazine(N2H4) and Aerozine-50 are also used in deep space missions because they are storable and hypergolic, and can be used as a monopropellant with a catalyst.
And such a great looking rocket with those 4 boosters at the back 
