Thanks, I asume the 618 camera is only a little better than the original version but at present the original version is really the only one in my price range and its looking like the way I shall go (for now, as I have only just purchased the scope)
The images were completed in Registax from start to finish it used all 4000 frames at 60% saved and gave the results you can see.
Autostakkert has not done well for me. It sempt to work for my old Vesta Pro AVI's but the results with the DBK have not been as good at all. (or so I think)
When I loaded this AVI in AutoStakkert it only loaded 20% and fell to 0% quality and a red line saying it could not load the frame. I then used Castrator which dropped the frames to 1600 and then loaded into AutoStakkerat. The image seems to be okay but I am not sure as I lost so much data.
Some feed back on this image would be good it is the same AVI as the previous three done with the above process Castrator and AutoStakkert and I used the same wavelet scheme as the third of the first group.
I tried drizzle on Registax and that gave me a lower quality image which I was not happy with, drizzle on Autostakkert left a section of Saturn missing as if someone had cut it out with scissors very strange. Any advice on processing would be great as I seem to struggling a bit with this.
Thanks
Carl
Quote:
Originally Posted by asimov
Nice work Carl. The old version of the DBK was quite a nice camera but the 618 chipped version is just so much better again...If you get the chance...
Are you stacking in Autostakkert? if so you could try a 1.5X drizzle (& reduce before posting if necessary) to get some scale.
|