Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
  #1  
Old 12-03-2005, 05:41 PM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Comet C/2005 A1

Tried last night to view this comet near gobular cluster 47Tuc , unsuccessful both visually and with a camera , anyone have luck , try again tonite
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2005, 05:48 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Might have a look tonight if we can fit it in. Near 47 Tuc you say.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2005, 06:02 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Yep we all saw it last night on Andrews dob...very small but we all got a bit of a peek....

Andrew might elaborate on this further...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-03-2005, 01:06 AM
astro_south's Avatar
astro_south (Andrew)
No GOTO..I enjoy the hunt

astro_south is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,094
Yeah, I heard it was there and located it easily enough with a scan around the glob - around 1 degree from 47Tuc Friday night - it was pretty small. Also saw it in a C11 later in the night with high magnification, and the coma showed a tear drop shape leading towards a very faint tail.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-03-2005, 08:11 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Beren,
since you asked.
It shows all the hallmarks of poor preparation, with a little field rottation etc, but is shows what it needs to.
One thing that was obvious was the difference in brightness between the comet, and 47 Tuc, as well as the colour.
Nikon D100, at ISO125. A series of 8 exposures each about 2 minutes, using a Nikkor 300mm at f4.5.
Gary
P.S. Ugly as it is, I am looking to see if I can re-stack with Registax and reduce/eliminate the rotation.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-03-2005, 07:57 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
OK, not being happy with the terrible field rotation, I set about re-stacking the separate images. This time I used a different routine to overcome this rotation, and the attached image shows pretty much what the eye saw, well perhaps not the green tinge, but nearly. Same details as before.
I'll give you a day or so to digest both images, then bin the horrible one, lest it makes too many ill.

Better perhaps?
Gary
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (linear-2005maxweb.jpg)
97.4 KB65 views
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-03-2005, 11:26 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
top stuff Gary Especially the glob. Any idea what's causing the colour difference (red) around the comet and between the comet and 47 Tuc
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-03-2005, 05:54 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That's excellent Gary!

I saw the comet at the SPSP on Friday night (forgot to look on Saturday). It was well placed next to 47Tuc, and I spotted the fuzz in my finder, so finding it in the eyepiece was no problems.

It was very faint, not much coma to be seen but it was definitely recognisable.

Is it going to get brighter?

Gary, send that 2nd shot to the astro mags.. it'll get pritned for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-03-2005, 06:39 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Hi Paul,
not entirely sure, but I think it is simply trying to tweak as much, possibly too much from the individual images/and the total image. I can make it worse with the levels function (and better).

Ice. May do that, I assumed they (Sky & Space) would have more than enough as it was.

Gary
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14-03-2005, 07:45 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Gary have you tried masking off the separate areas to process individually? So that you don't overprocess one area trying to bring out the detail in the other..

You should send it off, they may not have any and it would be great to have your shot printed again.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement