Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-05-2012, 08:10 AM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
First attempt at M5 - first image at new house

Hi!

Just moved to the next suburb in Canberra. The new place has a great courtyard for astronomy (but isn't very even).

Here is the first image. It still needs more processing (my wife is too busy with the move to process it atm ).

I find it tricky balancing exposure times for globs so that the core is still nice.

Scope: 9.25" SCT
Mount: CGEM
Camera: ATIK 320E
Guiding: 80mm with QHY5 and using PHD
Stacking: AstroArt
Exposures: 70 x 30 sec plus darks + bias
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (120509_M5.jpg)
125.3 KB94 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2012, 09:41 PM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,276
heh grant did you try and focus on a bright star first?
despite it being a little awkward i seem to get a good focus just using the cameras viewfinder
pat
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-2012, 07:56 AM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
I used a bah-mask to achieve focus on a bright star. I think part of the problem is guiding at 400mm focal length while I image at 2350mm.

Here is the wife-processed image...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (120509 M5 processed.jpg)
196.3 KB52 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-2012, 11:36 AM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,276
ooh thats quite a nice glob, perth is "supposed" to have a clear day and night tomorrow, i might check this one out
pat
by the way grant why is there a problem guiding and imaging at different focal lengths?
i will need to know these things soon enough so i am glad you have mentioned it
pat
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2012, 06:53 PM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
No problem at different lengths - just that 2350 is really long compared to 400. The shorter the main scope's focal length, the more forgiving it is of errors in tracking. It is easier to image at shorter focal lengths.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2012, 07:07 PM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,276
ah i see what you mean..... i tried some at f6.3 and things happen an awful lot quicker!
pat
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-05-2012, 01:25 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
glob

Nice glob!
The rough rule is supposed to be guide down to roughly one third the focal length of your imaging scope or something like that, saying that I guide quite well with a modified finder scope on a 900mm FL refractor.
I think it gets much more unforgiving when you are +1000 FL
The image scale becomes an issue as well if you use a small finder as guider but then try and guide a 2000+FL scope.
You can try binning the guide image but essentially the rule of thumb keeps you happy.
keep em coming'
Graz
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-05-2012, 02:46 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
Guiding is a tricky one, back in the days where auto guiding wasn't avalible same FL was the way to go, as when it moved the then your actual movements where small compared to the film

With the advent of modern guiding software and CCD's well you can get sub pixel guiding.

here is a picture of a GSO RC10 guided with a Orion Finderguider and SSAG on a EQ6 (properly tuned) and properly polar aligned. Sure its not pin point, but considerin the Finder is 200mm and the RC is 2000 mm... its doing damn fine!

here is my take on guiding more focused towards OAG but you can get a bit of a background on my findings.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-05-2012, 03:29 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
Hi Grant,

I think the issue here is more with focus than guiding, as your exposures are only 30 secs. Agreed, the long FL will require a longer FL at the guidescope and your FL ratio is around 1/6th, but I'd suggest getting the focus sorted out first.
what did the phd guiding graph look like?
Just take short exposures adjusting the focuser each time till you get the sharpest result possible without the mask and compare the before and after.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-05-2012, 07:13 PM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
I use a bah-mask to focus. Obviously I can always do better, but the focus wasn't too bad. Unfortunately, my dew heater is going full bore to keep the Canberra frost from setting in... so the SCT isn't well cooled down.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-05-2012, 07:15 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
glob

Brendo!-Love your work!
Fancy tuning up me old EQ 6?
Focus is truly the golden abalone here. This is the issue I have most consistent issues with personally, as I have never been really happy with what came out of the other end after trying my damn hardest. Use a mask, use your eyes, use software (FWHM or HFD) I remember a post Leon did some time back about just taking your specs off and squinting-sort of a mammalian diffraction mask!
Gem, you count yourself lucky you have her indoors to do all the processing, so you can concentrate on the looking at the beautiful night sky, taking some pictures (and drinking some fine hooch to keep the mozzies away)
The slope is steep and expensive, but it is well worn and pats on the back make it an easier climb.
Graz from Taz
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15-05-2012, 07:30 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Congrats on your first light from your new home.
Your wife does a wonderful job with the processing.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15-05-2012, 09:39 PM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
Thanks.

Good news! I just order a Celestron 6.3 reducer/corrector. Should help things a bit!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 20-05-2012, 08:49 PM
Astromet's Avatar
Astromet
Registered User

Astromet is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: La Jonquera - Girona - Spain
Posts: 5
good job! try to sharpen the focus a little more
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement