ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Last Quarter 47.8%
|
|

28-01-2012, 06:52 PM
|
 |
Dark sky rules !
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 33S 150E (AU holiday)
Posts: 1,181
|
|
Yes, your eyes have noise !
Weird title, but it is true.
In a nearly (not completely) dark environment , e.g. when lying in your bed and morning twilight just starts, one can see the contours and patterns of objects, but no colors. The images are a bit fuzzy and grainy. Do you recognize ?
It looks just like a photo taken with very high ISO or and image with a small sensor camera (such as a phonecam) in low-light (but not as low as in this bedroom example).
So do our eyes really work like a camera sensor ?
I know, the camera sensor does not have separate high-sensitive monochrome pixels (rods) and lower sensitive color pixels (cones), but the noise looks the same.
Any ideas on this ?
|

28-01-2012, 07:39 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,799
|
|
Interesting theory, I will give it a try tomorrow morning, as I'm always up around dawn anyway.
Leon
|

29-01-2012, 05:39 AM
|
 |
1 of 7 of 9
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,968
|
|
I know what you are talking about, I have seen/experienced it myself.
However no idea what it is caused by.......
BTW, Mooie kasteel daar in Velp ( Biljoen)!
Bartman
|

29-01-2012, 07:14 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 101
|
|
What you're experiencing is mesopic (twilight) vision: things are visible but blurry and monochromatic. This contrasts with photopic (day time, high resolution colour) and scotopic (night time) vision.
As you already know, the inability to see colour in low light is due to the insensitivity of the cones in the retina which are responsible for colour vision. With these out of action, vision is only possible with the rods, which are more sensitive to light but cannot detect colour. You probably know that the eye is less sensitive to red light under mesopic and scotopic conditions and so doesn't respond when you use a red light at the telescope. An ordinary white light would trigger contraction of the pupil, etc so you'd lose your dark adaptation.
The low resolution (you call it 'noise') comes from the fact that, aside from the rods being less numerous than the cones (i.e. lower density means lower resolution), they are distributed around the retina away from the fovea. The fovea is a small (~2mm) depression at the back of the eye responsible for high resolution, such as reading this post. The eye cannot form sharp images very far away from the fovea: a few degrees away from the fovea visual acuity has dropped to ~50% and continues to fall off sharply. You can convince yourself of this by focussing on this mark - * - and trying to read the letters on the ads on the right of the screen, or in fact elsewhere in this message. So, even if the rods were densely packed they'd still "see" a distorted blurry image produced by the eye. The only sharp vision we have is at the fovea. This is where the problem starts.
The fovea is crammed with cones, but with these out of action due to insufficient light they cannot provide the high resolution needed to, say, read fine print under low light levels. While an image can fall on the retina away from the fovea, the lower density of rods in this part of the retina and the optical distortions away from the fovea means much lower resolution. The main problem is therefore the lack of rods in the fovea where the sharpest image is formed. So, no cones (due to low light), no rods (they're not there): no resolution hence a blurry image.
Adding to the loss of resolution is the dilation of the pupil in low light conditions, which allows more peripheral rays to enter the eye, amplifying the eyes many optical aberrations. In other words, even if cones were sensitive to low light levels, they would be receiving a distorted image from the dilated pupil. (Interestingly, this is why albinos often have poor vision: the lack of pigmentation in the iris means, in effect, the aberrations in the eye are amplified by an essentially non-existent pupil.)
Hope this answers the question. Let me know if I'm off track or you want to know more.
Cheers,
Geoff Mc
Last edited by GeoffMc; 29-01-2012 at 07:25 AM.
|

29-01-2012, 08:29 AM
|
 |
1 of 7 of 9
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,968
|
|
Wow Geoff,
It certainly cleared the question for me ( pardon the pun  )
Thanks
Bartman
|

29-01-2012, 04:28 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 760
|
|
Great answer, Geoff - thanks for taking the time to give so much detail!
|

08-03-2012, 07:08 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Pingrup WA
Posts: 37
|
|
Yes, I've noticed the noise ever since i was a kid, not only in low light but under most lighting conditions. It's most noticeable when viewing a low contrast scene, such as a ceiling or the sky, and seems to be closely related to the visual noise I get with eyes closed.
|

13-03-2012, 01:27 PM
|
 |
The devil's advocate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 816
|
|
Dam i was going to peilter cool my eyes to
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:06 PM.
|
|