Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-02-2012, 01:05 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,468
Riccardi-Honders first light

Not expecting any clear weather, I was surprised by the lack of clouds this evening, hence bolted a CCD to my new scope.

As murphy's law would have it, there was insufficient back-focus using standard adapters to accept the STX & filterwheel.

Removing the filter wheel provided a temporary fix.(a suitable adapter will not arrive for a couple of weeks)

There was no doubting the focus...just a gentle tweak of the 10:1 saw peak values jump 20% with another tweak showing a similar drop.

I have to say the edge stars did not look too shabby at all....can't wait to do some deep NB with this puppy!

Anyway, below is the "first light" image (OK...chose a standard candle: Eta Carina ) No filter. exposure was just 5 minutes.

The image is uncropped but was re-sized at 50% to be web friendly

The link is here
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-02-2012, 01:56 AM
Mighty_oz (Marcus)
Registered User

Mighty_oz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atm somewhere in Perth
Posts: 575
Great pic there, almost as good as mine
They'll be a wonder to behold when u get that adapter and get some color into it. Pretty deep for 5 mins too
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-02-2012, 02:08 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
Wow, what a huge chunk of sky. You'll have fun with that one.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-02-2012, 07:33 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Woohoo - lookie dat!

Beautiful.

That bodes well.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-02-2012, 08:17 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
That was expected from an AP. Flawless.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-02-2012, 09:06 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,781
Hi Peter,
That is a perfect photo.
I love the ultra wide flat field & I can't wait to see
a full colour processed version when you get
a filter wheel connected.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-02-2012, 09:17 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,276
5 min total now that is going to be impressive with more and the stars appear as tight as a fishes ....

Noice
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-02-2012, 09:30 AM
JohnG's Avatar
JohnG (John)
Looking Down From Above

JohnG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cootamundra, NSW
Posts: 1,711
Nice Peter, you gotta be happy with that .

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-02-2012, 09:52 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Nice Peter, but when are you going to set up all this gear at a dark site and do remote imaging? Seems a waste really to have three fine telescopes in Sydney that could be doing deep work.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-02-2012, 09:58 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnG View Post
Nice Peter, you gotta be happy with that .

Cheers
Thanks mate. Yep looks like it will be another AP classic

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
5 min total now that is going to be impressive with more and the stars appear as tight as a fishes ....

Noice
Watertight

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Peter,
That is a perfect photo.
I love the ultra wide flat field & I can't wait to see
a full colour processed version when you get
a filter wheel connected.
Thanks, maybe not perfect , but wide and flat for sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
That was expected from an AP. Flawless.
Thanks Marc. AP seem to do it consistently well. 5 micron stars across the field

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Woohoo - lookie dat!

Beautiful.

That bodes well.

Greg.
Ta Greg. The field is vignetted a tad (I used a 2.7" fitting). Precise parts are making a 3" adapter that will allow use of the filter-wheel and open things up a bit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tandum View Post
Wow, what a huge chunk of sky. You'll have fun with that one.
Boys and their toys!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty_oz View Post
Great pic there, almost as good as mine
They'll be a wonder to behold when u get that adapter and get some color into it. Pretty deep for 5 mins too
Thanks. That's the plan. ....I wonder what the weather will do..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-02-2012, 11:26 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Thanks Marc. AP seem to do it consistently well. 5 micron stars across the field
Is focus tricky on this thing? How big is the CFZ?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-02-2012, 11:45 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,468
Attached are a couple of CCDinspector plots of the RHA's performance over a 50mm diagonal (KAF16803) field.

Interesting result, looks like there is a teeny bit of tilt that may need shimming out. FWHM's look to be seeing limited to around 2 pixels or 3 arc sec.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (RHAcurve.jpg)
89.6 KB35 views
Click for full-size image (RHA3dplane.jpg)
49.6 KB41 views
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-02-2012, 01:51 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Wow. Can't wait to see what this baby can do in full colour!

Marc, at f/3.8, the CFZ on this puppy is just 31.8 microns. The FSQ-106N is 55 microns. So, very, very finicky!

H
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17-02-2012, 02:55 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Great things to come....congrats on the new scope!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-02-2012, 03:32 PM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
What a wonderful new toy Peter. I drooled over your other post when you got your hands on it
Stars look great to the edge!
You have to drag that to a dark sky site!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-02-2012, 03:32 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Is focus tricky on this thing? How big is the CFZ?
Thanks to H for doing the math...

Yep about 30 microns. That said I found focus with the 10:1 feathertouch was easy.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-02-2012, 03:41 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garyh View Post
What a wonderful new toy Peter. I drooled over your other post when you got your hands on it
Stars look great to the edge!
You have to drag that to a dark sky site!
Thanks. Indeed, the stars are remarkably tight across to the edge of the sensor...

As I mentioned you can see slight evidence of (camera tilt) at full-res, but that's easily fixed so I'm very happy with the results so far... but don't see myself hauling it to a dark site just yet

Quote:
Originally Posted by atalas View Post
Great things to come....congrats on the new scope!
Thanks... Hopefully I'll be able to do it justice over the next few months.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Wow. Can't wait to see what this baby can do in full colour!

Marc, at f/3.8, the CFZ on this puppy is just 31.8 microns. The FSQ-106N is 55 microns. So, very, very finicky!

H
Ta H ..saved me looking up the formula. I'm thinking narrow band results should be splendid
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-02-2012, 04:57 PM
richardo's Avatar
richardo (Rich)
Love reflection Nebs !

richardo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Streaky Bay
Posts: 1,070
Wow Pete, pretty darn smick all the way out to the very edges that's for sure.
I cranked your 'Web' friendly version(not really friendly in any other terms)... way up on my 24" mon checking for any star discrepancies around the edge......
Ahh, not a sign.
Beautifully consistent the whole field over.
The slight elongation could be as mentioned slight camera tilt, and at these extremes you are dealing with, more likely the prob.
But that is on the verge of nit picking I'd say.

I won't ask the price tag (that's rude ...)... well how much
But looks like you have yourself one hell of an express photon grabber

Can't wait to see the first serious image from this hunk of imaging magic

All the best
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-02-2012, 05:19 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Mmm, so what happens to the RCOS then, in a box?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17-02-2012, 05:58 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardo View Post
Wow Pete, pretty darn smick all the way out to the very edges that's for sure.............

I won't ask the price tag (that's rude ...)... well how much
But looks like you have yourself one hell of an express photon grabber

Can't wait to see the first serious image from this hunk of imaging magic

All the best
Rich
Ta Rich !

Smick is a good description .

Roland Christien is a without doubt an optical wizard so I don't expect any surprises when the imaging sessions begin in earnest.

The price is on AP's website....call it $A, add about 20% for shipping and GST to get one to the land of Oz.

Ditto on wanting to get it cranked up with filters etc.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Mmm, so what happens to the RCOS then, in a box?
Sold it in a garage sale for $20.

(actually it's inside... mirrors to be pulled and re-coated real soon now..a pity the mount can't hold both )
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement