Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-12-2011, 10:27 PM
cventer's Avatar
cventer
Registered User

cventer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 957
Combining different length subs

Newb question I know.

I just realised tonight that when i Imaged an object recently over multiple nights I took different Luminance exposure lengths by accident.

About 6 subs are 5 min and 6 x 8 min.

Can these be comined ? is there any benefit in doing so ? Or should I just use the 6 x 8 minute frames ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-12-2011, 10:35 PM
DavidTrap's Avatar
DavidTrap (David)
Really just a beginner

DavidTrap is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,045
You can merge them as a HDR, but they need to be stacked in groups according to length.

DT
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-12-2011, 07:48 AM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
OK.. newbie questions...

HDR = ??

What do you mean stacked in groups? Why can't you just stack all of them together?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-12-2011, 08:53 AM
DavidTrap's Avatar
DavidTrap (David)
Really just a beginner

DavidTrap is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,045
HDR = high dynamic range.

Stacking in groups means stack the 5min subs together and the 8 mins together, the combine (different software routine) them to make an HDR image.

Greatly simplified, if you stack as a median combine, the software picks the "middle value" for each pixel. The idea of using a median combine rather than average is to remove outlying values that will usually be noise. If you mix subs of differing length, calculating the middle value doesn't produce the result you're after.

Remember, stacking images is not adding them together to make a brighter image. It is a statistical process to improve signal to noise of your image. It makes the image background darker because more noise is obvious in the darker regions of the image.

DT
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-12-2011, 05:47 PM
wasyoungonce's Avatar
wasyoungonce (Brendan)
Certified Village Idiot

wasyoungonce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mexico city (Melb), Australia
Posts: 2,359
And.... you can layer mask blend parts of images. For example layer mask in blend shorter subs of M42 core with longer subs so you don't have oversaturated core.

Video tutes on this from Louie, here and Doug here.

Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-12-2011, 08:35 PM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
It all depends on what object they are from.
If it is not a bright object like M42 etc then just stack them all together without blending, easy peasy.
If it is M42 then stack them separately and mask blend them.

Martin.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-12-2011, 08:47 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
If you take images on different nights of different exposure lengths and different image sizes and different rotations and from different cameras and different scopes and different everything else you can stack them all together in a great program called Registar

Registar is a powerful tool for stacking images of the same object you have taken over many years from many sorts of cameras and scopes.

I tried it with about 10 of my M42 images taken over the years. They were all different scales, orientations and FOV's, and it stacked them all into one really nice image

Last edited by ballaratdragons; 21-12-2011 at 09:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-12-2011, 10:15 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Yes, it really does depend on object and software. Most powerful imaging software can correct for different exposure conditions if you give it enough info (e.g. bias, darks, etc to work with to adjust for changing conditions).

Best to at least try it and see what happens. If no good, then have to deal with them separately or use different software.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-12-2011, 10:27 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Yes, it really does depend on object and software. Most powerful imaging software can correct for different exposure conditions if you give it enough info (e.g. bias, darks, etc to work with to adjust for changing conditions).
I processed a bunch of 15 and 30 minute Ha subs together in CCDStack and found that the normalization process gave approximately double the weighting to the longer subs and gave me the result I was hoping for. A reprocess in PixInsight gave me good results too. It's worth a try!

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-12-2011, 11:21 PM
cventer's Avatar
cventer
Registered User

cventer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 957
Thanks Everyone

I tired it in CCD stack and as you said Normalising the data gave the shorter subs less weighting and a pretty good end result.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement