The UV imaging data taken by GALEX is full of very unusual objects....it takes me only a few days to dredge up all manner of peculiar and anomalous galaxies!! The difficulty, for amateurs, is usually to discern what is genuinely unusual and what is "already known" by professional astronomers. For years, I often presented various "so-called-discoveries" to the pros, only to get the reply "nothing very unusual!!", but I have
gradually become so familiar with the normal appearance of galaxies that I have slowly developed a real eye for things that "don't look quite right".
There are not a lot of people looking at this "hot" data, compared to the "masses" looking at the SDSS images. Further, from all I have read of the literature, it seems to me that professional astronomers have not really come to grips with all that can be found in the ultraviolet sky!
How to access GALEX images:
Just go to:
http://galex.stsci.edu/GalexView
Firstly, remember that the FUV band is coded as blue in these images.....that is where all the
really weird stuff is! Yellow in these images codes for detected
near-ultraviolet light, which is mainly from ordinary stellar photospheres.
(1) Tick the "full resolution" tick box at the top right.
(2) Untick the "Display Objects" tick box at top right....this removes a lot of confusing overlays.
(3) Tick the "display graphics" tick box, if you want a red ring to be shown around the target object.
(4) Tick the fourth icon from the left in the row of icons at top right. This has a small galaxy on it and it is called "Image Layout". This increases the size of the Virtual Sky display.
Lastly,
one more very important step:
Often, when you use the "search for object" box to enter the co-ordinates or name of the desired target object, what comes up is only a
noisy and short-exposure image of the field.
In many cases, a
much better image is available of the same field; to get it, you go to the third icon from the left in the row of icons at top right. This icon has a sort of "grid" on it, and clicking this icon brings up a list of various available exposures......it is common enough to find a longer exposure of the same field, which is usually of much higher image quality.
_________________________
Here are two sample GALEX images (NGC 1313, NGC 1097), obtained using this GalexView interface: