Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-03-2006, 10:00 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
new 50mm Eta Carina widefield image

Hi all
Its 2 x 5 mins ISO 800, 50mm f1.8 canon lens stopped down to f4.5 with 2 inch Baader UHCS filter sitting on front .Modded EOS 350D camera, piggybacked on my 10 inch Newtonian.
Larger image here
http://www.users.on.net/~josiah/baad...5uhcssmall.jpg
Scott
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (eta50mm2x5iso800f4.5uhcssmallb.jpg)
128.7 KB59 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-2006, 07:42 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
I lost count after 10, gee there are lots of stars there! nice shot!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-03-2006, 08:56 AM
astroboy's Avatar
astroboy
Registered User

astroboy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Bathurst NSW
Posts: 703
Very nice image Scott .
Does the 50mm need to be stopped down to F4.5 to get good star images at the corners or is it a vignetting issue with the filter.

Zane
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-03-2006, 01:19 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
lordy! how many stars in that pic????
dave you are right... I tiik off my shoes and got up to 22 and theres more still

great shot!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-03-2006, 04:56 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Many thanks all
Yes, Zane, if I shoot with lens wide open at f1.8 I get some comatic stars near the edges, however with the UHCS filter on the coma isnt too bad it must be because the UHCS blocks a lot of the UV and deep blue that might otherwise lead to chromatic abberations and coma. Focussing is a bit of a pain, sometimes I can be lucky other times Ive got to take dozens of test images to get it spot on. The latitude is tiny, moving the focus ring a fraction of a mm makes a noticable change. I love the old film lenses that manual focus, the focus is much finer, whereas the EOS lenses are really made for AF with manual put on as an afterthought.
I get no noticable vignetting with the uhcs filter at all even though its slightly smaller then the UV cover filter. I do, however, with the zoom kit lens that came with the 300D camera.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-03-2006, 09:20 AM
astroboy's Avatar
astroboy
Registered User

astroboy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Bathurst NSW
Posts: 703
Good tip about the lens focusing , I was thinking of buying one of the Canon 50mms but probably better off sticking with the Nikon MF lenses ( I bought an adapter for Canon EOS ) the focusing is difficult enough as it is.

Zane
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement