Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy Books and Media
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 27-01-2012, 10:41 AM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Moon colony by 2020, yeah, right

Another day, another bizzar moment.
Newt Gingrich, proposed that, if the Americans elect him president, he will make a colony on the moon by 2020
It gets better, he would also make the Moon the 51st State once the population reaches 13,000.
Is it April 1 already
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-01-2012, 10:56 AM
michaellxv's Avatar
michaellxv (Michael)
Registered User

michaellxv is online now
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,581
Maybe they could ask the Russians to send them there.
At least they still have a launch system to put humans into space.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-01-2012, 11:58 AM
vanwonky (Dave)
Registered User

vanwonky is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 242
They might need extra booster rockets as the population would have doubled in size by then.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-01-2012, 01:21 PM
Rodstar's Avatar
Rodstar (Rod)
The Glenfallus

Rodstar is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,702
Hopefully Newt will be one of the colonisers......that way, we would never hear from him again.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-01-2012, 01:47 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
It would be nice to see it happen.

Sadly though it's just vote chasing and nothing more.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-01-2012, 07:37 PM
Stardrifter_WA
Life is looking up!

Stardrifter_WA is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,017
Newt Gingrich’s Fantasy Moon Base Is Illegal

see full story at Gizmodo:

http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2012/01/ne...l/#more-509665
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-01-2012, 08:02 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Being illegal hasn't stopped a recent war somewhere in the middle east...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-01-2012, 08:15 PM
Shark Bait's Avatar
Shark Bait (Stu)
'ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha'

Shark Bait is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,017
I read a document recently that discussed how inadequate the laws surrounding Space were. The paper discussed how the laws need to be updated.

China seem keen to make their claim. It will be interesting to see if this creates another space race.

In my perfect world, a Moon Base would be supported and operated in a similar way to the International Space Station.

Last edited by Shark Bait; 30-01-2012 at 09:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-01-2012, 08:55 PM
Stardrifter_WA
Life is looking up!

Stardrifter_WA is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by traveller View Post
Being illegal hasn't stopped a recent war somewhere in the middle east...
Good point!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30-01-2012, 09:17 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
My own personal belief is that no particular nation has any right to claim land or sovereignty anywhere in space.

Any claim on any unclaimed/uninhabited Moon/planet/asteroid etc or even region of space, needs to be made in the name of all the people of Planet Earth.

When it comes to space, there should be no 'Americans' or 'Russians' or 'Chinese' or 'Indians' etc.
In space we are Earthlings (or Terrans).

But it won't happen

The problem is that because America is losing its status as the so called 'Policemen of the World', they want to establish themselves as the Policemen of Space.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 30-01-2012, 09:48 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Agreed Ken, but I doubt the yanks can afford to become police anywhere in the next little while. Most of their foreign exchange reserves are now held by the Chinese.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31-01-2012, 11:52 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,742
What colossal arrogance - to declare that the US has the right to establish a colony AND to appropriate any portion of the moon at US territory. I find it difficult to grasp how anyone could actually formulate that as a serious item of a government's agenda (even in election mode).

Heaven preserve us from such people.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31-01-2012, 03:37 PM
Stardrifter_WA
Life is looking up!

Stardrifter_WA is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid View Post
What colossal arrogance - to declare that the US has the right to establish a colony AND to appropriate any portion of the moon at US territory. I find it difficult to grasp how anyone could actually formulate that as a serious item of a government's agenda (even in election mode).

Heaven preserve us from such people.

Peter
It is just rhetoric, it will never happen. Just look at the debt America is in now, so where are they going to find the money for such a huge undertaking? Or, perhaps they could stop having wars.....nah, that ain't going to happen.

After all, "War" is natures way of teaching Americans geography!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31-01-2012, 04:24 PM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,554
Newt should review history before opening his mouth...

1) The Space Shuttle Program started in 1968
2) The first launch of the Shuttle was in 1980

2012 + 12 = 2024 at the earliest. Can they do it faster?

In the famous "tongue in cheek" motto of NASA...

"Better, Faster, Cheaper ............. Pick Two"
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-02-2012, 09:05 AM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,888
On a technical note - I remember reading that a major sun flare would have killed all the astronauts that did moon landings. Even doing the journey puts you at risk. US Scientists charted solar activity and time the landing for peak lows - and hoped no astronauts would die.

Their calucate odds were around 3-4% from recall. Basically a large flare directed towards the Earth / Moon would not be survivable if you didn't have planetary level magnetic shielding to stop high energy particles irradiating you.

I ponder could a deep underground base work - say 50-100 metres or more with large generators powering an E/M shield on the surface help? That would be plenty to stop protons from Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), cosmic rays - no so sure:

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news...n_solarflares/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-02-2012, 07:43 PM
Keltik's Avatar
Keltik (Trevor)
Canis Major, Canis Minor

Keltik is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 98
Matthew...I remember seeing this photo in the late 60's or early 70's after the astronauts got back from space...a cast of cosmic ray penetrations in a space helmet.http://www.sciencephoto.com/image/14...800_ti-SPL.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-02-2012, 01:47 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day View Post
On a technical note - I remember reading that a major sun flare would have killed all the astronauts that did moon landings. Even doing the journey puts you at risk. US Scientists charted solar activity and time the landing for peak lows - and hoped no astronauts would die.

Their calucate odds were around 3-4% from recall. Basically a large flare directed towards the Earth / Moon would not be survivable if you didn't have planetary level magnetic shielding to stop high energy particles irradiating you.

I ponder could a deep underground base work - say 50-100 metres or more with large generators powering an E/M shield on the surface help? That would be plenty to stop protons from Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), cosmic rays - no so sure:

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news...n_solarflares/
If not a buried base, then perhaps one either on the far side or in the polar regions where some craters are in permanent shadow. That was the thesis in one of Arthur Clarke's novels (Sun Storm) I think.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-02-2012, 10:58 AM
deejayvee (David)
Registered User

deejayvee is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid View Post
If not a buried base, then perhaps one either on the far side or in the polar regions where some craters are in permanent shadow.
The polar regions would make sense. The far side would get as much sun as the near side though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement