Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-08-2011, 02:47 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
Which camera for Planetary Imaging?

im looking at buying my first camera for Planet imaging. I wanted to buy the Flea 3 GIGE but they are taking so long to release it. Anyone got any suggestions on other camera options? I havent imaged before but im really good with computers.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-08-2011, 09:02 PM
BlackWidow's Avatar
BlackWidow (Mardy)
Seeing Stars

BlackWidow is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Adelaide Australia
Posts: 610
SPc 900nc

I would suggest a philips sc900nc webcam for planet shots. They have been the standard for a long time. Used with Registax software they give very good results and are very cost effective.


Regards
Martin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2011, 10:35 PM
graphworlok (James)
Registered User

graphworlok is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 54
Most planets are relatively bright, but small - many webcams will give a reasonable image with some minor modifications. I have had reasonable results with a Logitech C600 webcam - it has adjustable gain and other features, and is 2MP, but doesn't have auto focus to drive the price up. It still is quite expensive though - $70 or so.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2011, 04:55 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Hi Mark
What scope will you use it with?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2011, 09:50 AM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
i use a celestron C14 on a losmandy G11. However im currently in the process of building a Pier.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2011, 10:47 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
The Philips & Logitech's with give reasonable results however the next step up would be a flea3 or an imaging source camera. Depends on how seriously you want to take planet imaging.

I have 3 philips cams & 2 imaging source cams. There's no way I'd drop back to a Philips except to relive old times.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2011, 12:24 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Any comparison shots of what you get through the phillips webcams vs through the imaging source cameras?

The new imaging source cameras have similar specs to the Flea3, are they out yet?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2011, 04:14 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
im looking at the imaging source DMK 21AF04.AS instead of the Flea 3 camera.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2011, 04:20 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Starting with monochrome is a tough ask if you're new to planetary imaging. Playing around with filters at capture time, and then processing 3x as much, can be a real pain in the butt.

I'd start with the DFK colour camera - it's much easier to get going and get the bug, get the handle on capture and processing, and move to monochrome later.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2011, 11:52 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
You have got a serious scope so why not a serious imaging setup? Do you want to do monochrome and have you had any experience with it in the past? If so this is a piece of cake really. If not maybe consider a colour camera with a high download rate to start with. Though if you want to do Mono, then look at electronic filter wheel. It makes it a little easier during imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-08-2011, 06:37 AM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
You could start with a DFK colour, then if mono attracts you, sell it and go mono. The DFK cameras are in demand, so you won't lose much cash when you sell it. They go pretty fast second hand.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-08-2011, 01:51 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
think ill go for a colour camera till i get some experience with imaging then switch to a good mono camera maybe in a couple of years.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-08-2011, 01:45 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
If you get tired of it, I'll probably be in line to buy it off you
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:09 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
anyone know a place to buy the DFK usb colour camera in australia? Will i need to buy a electric focuser if im new to imaging?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:11 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Bintel sell the DFK's, Mark. I think telescopes-astronomy do as well.

You don't *need* an electric focuser. It always helps, but it's not absolutely essential.

It's obviously helpful for 2 reasons:
1. You don't need to touch the scope, so you don't wobble the scope and make the image bounce around
2. It's more accurate because you can move it in tiny increments.

I just use a cheap Orion Accufocus on my 12" dob.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:40 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
I don't agree about the focusor. I think electronic focusors are essential, especially when dealing with high f ratios and focal lengths and that combined with an SCT. Just touching an SCT on a pier at high res and trying to focus it on a screen is an exercise in frustration. Choice is yours but I would be thinking saving myself that frustration.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-08-2011, 12:03 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
I think you really do have to look at your seeing & general overall conditions, as to whether or not you would bother going RGB imaging. I get better success from using my DBK for various reasons, over the mono DMK imager. I'm not saying the DBK gives better results - I'm saying I get MORE imaging done with it.

As for focusing - I've got the electric JMI but I use it manually. I don't find it frustrating to use at all. I focus, wait 2 secs for things to settle down, refocus etc. etc. I was weened on manual focus & I'm therefore good at it.

As for going a DFK - It has the factory fitted IR/UV cut filter. I'd rather add my own screw-on Baader filter so I'll wait for the DBK release. I've seen iffy results with the DFK.....Ask Lester, a member here.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-08-2011, 03:59 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
if i were to buy the DBK colour camera could i watch the planet on the computer screen instead of looking through the eyepiece and zoom in etc?

John are you talking about this camera? Would you put an IR filter on the camera for objects like venus and saturn?

http://www.astronomycameras.com/en/p.../dbk21au618as/
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-08-2011, 04:31 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
That's the new 618 chipped DBK Mark. Note it doesn't come with a factory fitted IR filter & so you can add your own filter of *assumed better* quality. I have the same cam only it has the old sensor in it.

I think an IR/UV cut filter is mandatory on a one shot colour cam. Without one you'll get colour bleeding & find it hard to get good focus, especially on low alt targets. I have a filtered versus non filtered image of mars somewhere, if I find it I'll post it.

Yep, you sure can watch a planet on the screen in real time with any of these camera's. Sometimes I get that mesmorized by it all I forget I'm out there to capture data! In good seeing I think viewing a planet onscreen is even better than through an EP.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-08-2011, 04:37 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Found the image.

Not a good example as far as images go, but the point here is to show you the effects with & without an IR/UV cut filter.

Non filtered on the left of course.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (mars_9th_iruvcut and no filter.jpg)
11.8 KB71 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement