Comet Garrad and NGC7094

[peeb61 (Paul)]

Hi All,
I took this image of Comet Garrad last Monday 1st August and was suprised to find a planetary, NGC7094 also in the field of view. You can see in at the bottom right hand side at 5 0'clock.

The image is a total of 2 x 3 minutes at 1600iso through my Canon 500D at prime focus with my trusty 8" f/4.

Paul

[alistairsam]

Originally Posted by peeb61

Hi All,
I took this image of Comet Garrad last Monday 1st August and was suprised to find a planetary, NGC7094 also in the field of view. You can see in at the bottom right hand side at 5 0'clock.

The image is a total of 2 x 3 minutes at 1600iso through my Canon 500D at prime focus with my trusty 8" f/4.

Paul

Hi Paul,

That's a nice catch. what coma corrector are you using, your stars are nice and round, is this a cropped view?

[peeb61 (Paul)]

Hi Alistairsam,
Thanks for the feedback. This is the full frame just reduced for this site and I am using the Baader CC, it's the one I bought off a member of this site and it works like a dream.

Paul

[Ross G]

Great photo Paul...so unique.

Where did you image from?

Thanks.

Ross.

[peeb61 (Paul)]

Thanks Ross, From my home observatory in Wollongong. Skies are not the best but better than the big city furthur north. On a good night I can visually see the fainter galaxies around NGC4945, but when I am imaging? Need the Light Polution Filter.

Paul

[jjjnettie (Jeanette)]

Well nabbed !! What a great shot.

[peeb61 (Paul)]

Thanks jjj...yours is not too shabby either, I looked at yours and went Wow! I mean this Comet is moving quite fast by exposure terms as you can see the apparent movement after a 2 minute exposure so stacking for a full back ground is really not an option unless you stack on the Comet for trailing stars that is but you nailed it big time.

Paul

[jjjnettie (Jeanette)]

You can take your series of 2 or 3 minutes exposures and turn them into an animation.
Which is what I did last night. LOL

[peeb61 (Paul)]

That jjj I might try, I did it once before for on McNaught and that turned out pretty good, the only downside was the finished movie was on the 16mb mark.

Paul

[anthony.tony]

Nice work.

[peeb61 (Paul)]

Anthony...it's not too bad for 6 minutes worth of work plus of course the slight stacking and processing, I will be keeping an eye on this one and catch some more images when the clouds part.

Paul