Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-06-2011, 09:23 PM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
Help with PEMpro data

I have just spent the evening with my worms.

I got PEMpro the other day as I am going to upgrade my G11 worms shortly and add the one-piece blocks, so I wanted to quantify what my mounts performance was like before the upgrade and after.

Problem is that beyond the easily understandable +/- arcsec measurement, I have no clue what the data is telling me.

Could someone who knows what they are on about please run their eyes over these graphs and tell me what's what?

Thanks
Adam
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2011-06-19_1.jpg)
73.1 KB34 views
Click for full-size image (2011-06-19_2.jpg)
72.8 KB30 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-06-2011, 09:36 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
For a start it looks like you have the wrong mount selected according to the snapshot. It says AP1200. You need to select Gemini Lvl4 from the list then do a couple of runs (8) then take it from there. PEMpro has a very good manual explaining all the parameters and how to interpret the data.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-06-2011, 09:58 PM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
hmmm..I'm pretty sure I selected the right mount in the setup tab....

I wasn't connecting to the mount, and the worm period and image scale looks correct, so I am hoping the data is still applicable?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-06-2011, 06:13 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
As far as I know all the software does is record the errors required to autoguide the scope. So if you select the correct mount now it should simply recalculate the correct period for the worm and adjust the graph as it at the moment thinks the worm is repeating its cycle when it is not and the resulting PE curve would be useless.

One tip also. I use Precision PEC by Bisque but it is similar to Pempro. Once you've done a PE curve, use it and watch the guide errors. If they are not better then your curve is off somehow. Most likely it is upside down like mine was - (took me 2-3 months to detect that!).


Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-06-2011, 06:56 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
My 2 cents also would be you have the G11 singing already Adam, so be careful you end up at least as well off with the upgrade. The PE is very respectable, and very slowly changing over a long timespan. Most EQ6/Heq5 owners would kill to have something that smooth

I hope that is a very smoothed PEC you're showing rather than the actual PE plot or I'm coming over to plunder your house!
This thread started by Peter has an example of my dodgey mount tracking:
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...&highlight=pec
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-06-2011, 07:47 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by adman View Post
hmmm..I'm pretty sure I selected the right mount in the setup tab....

I wasn't connecting to the mount, and the worm period and image scale looks correct, so I am hoping the data is still applicable?
The G11 and AP1200 worm periods are not the same (4min-6min), so um.........., did you change the worm period manually?.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement