Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hothersall
I think those data sets are pretty sharp and storm structure quite fine, I can trace Cassini div through front rings, wonder if this storm will last till next year? Both Paul and I agree R5 seems better for detail but R6 gives noticable sharper smoother rings.
John.
|
Thanks John, I think R6 is considerably better than R5 for good Jupiter data. In that case there is so much well resolved detail right across the image that R6 can successfully anchor hundreds of alignment points and thus perform a better aligning job. Good data requires very minimal application of wavelets.
I think the new linked wavelets function with R6 can be very harsh and is better suited to very ordinary data.
The case with Saturn is very different with only the rings, CD & storm structure offering good anchor points , especially so in good seeing. The very subtle banding on Saturn does not offer much for alignment points to anchor to.
Over time I have sorted R5 very nicely and I agree with you that it does a better job with Saturn, especially with the storm structure, which for me is the over riding factor with my Saturn imaging. I would much prefer to resolve fine detail within the storm structure for the researchers that use my data than to go for a smoother view just for esthetic's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hickny
Trevor,
You have to be happy with these. Well done.
|
Thanks Peter, Yep pretty happy but in this game its all about the quality of the seeing and we all lust after better seeing.